Indiana Fever vs. Los Angeles Sparks Prediction & Betting Picks (August 5, 2025)
The Los Angeles Sparks (12–15) will welcome the Indiana Fever (17–12) to California for a game that is more even than the standings look at first glance.
The Fever are doing just fine without Caitlin Clark; dare we say, more than fine? They’re in fifth place despite Clark’s absence, and the Sparks are still near the bottom but have shown some signs of life in recent games.
L.A. is coming off a 108–106 double-overtime win over Seattle, where Rickea Jackson dropped 27 and Dearica Hamby sealed it with a last-possession finish. All five starters scored in double figures, and four of them topped 20.
Indiana also beat the Storm, 78–74, behind 21 from Natasha Howard. Kelsey Mitchell had an off night shooting (3-for-16), but the Fever got enough out of the supporting group to close it out. They’re looking good without Clark, and it’s because of group effort on the glass and a solid, unselfish offense.
They’ve won three in a row on the road, but the Sparks have bested them two times this season.
Who do we think has the chops to pull off this win? Keep scrolling to see the matchup overview, trends, stats, the current betting odds, our picks for the three best bets, and our final score prediction!
Game Details
- Matchup: Indiana Fever (17–12) vs. Los Angeles Sparks (12–15)
- Date & Time: Tuesday, August 5, at 10 pm ET
- Venue: Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, CA
- How to Watch: ESPN2 or with the WNBA League Pass
Matchup Overview

Indiana Fever (17–12, 8–6 away)
Indiana comes into this on a five-game win streak, and they’ve done it without their star rookie. They’re putting up 85.1 points per game (4th in the league), with Kelsey Mitchell and Aliyah Boston stepping into bigger roles.
Defensively, they allow 80.8 PPG, which is slightly above league average, but have shown much better late-game execution. They’re also 6–3 ATS in their last nine on the road.

Los Angeles Sparks (12–15, 3–9 home)
The Sparks have won four of their last five overall, but their home form is still a problem; they’re only 2–8 ATS in their last 10 at Crypto.com Arena.
They’re allowing 88 points per game, which is one of the league’s highest marks, and haven’t had reliable stretches of stops. Dearica Hamby’s been the linchpin, but defensive lapses keep them stuck in close games or chasing deficits.
Recent Trends & Key Stats
This game will hint on how Indiana’s defense holds up against L.A.’s interior-focused attack. The Sparks rely on early seals from Hamby and quick reads in the paint, but Indiana’s help coverage has leveled up during their streak. The Fever’s off-ball movement and mid-post actions through Boston could stretch a Sparks defense that’s been slow to rotate all season.
Head-to-Head History
- The Sparks beat the Fever twice this season: 89–79 on June 26 and 87–85 on July 5.
- L.A. has won 7 of its last 8 home games against Indiana.
Scoring & Pace Trends
- Indiana is putting up 85.1 points per game, and that’s good for top four in the league.
- The Sparks are right up there with them at 85.5 PPG.
- Total points in Sparks games are averaging 173.5, and that’s just under the posted number.
- The Over has landed in 6 of Indiana’s last 9 and 7 of L.A.’s last 10.
Injuries
- Caitlin Clark is still out with a groin injury and isn’t expected to return to the court until mid-August.
- The Sparks have no major injuries. Dearica Hamby and Kelsey Plum are shouldering a bigger offensive load with extended minutes.
Betting Odds
What does the betting market have to say about this game? Here are the current odds and lines via ESPN BET:
Team | Spread | Moneyline | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Fever | -1.5 (-110) | -125 | Over 176.5 (-105) |
Sparks | +1.5 (-110) | +105 | Under 176.5 (-115) |
FYI: Odds can and do shift as tip-off gets closer, so don’t forget to check what the latest lines are before you place a wager!
Our Best Bets
Ready for our best bets? We’ve looked at the data and market trends, and we’ve landed on three:
Bet | Confidence Level | Why Do We Like It? |
---|---|---|
Fever –1.5 -110 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) | Indiana’s been the more dependable team on the road, and the Sparks keep losing winnable home games. |
Over 176.5 (-105) | ⭐⭐⭐ (3/5) | Because both teams are averaging over 85 points and the pace is trending high, the over has value. |
Fever +105 | ⭐⭐⭐ (3/5) | The spread is tight, but Indiana’s form and depth give them the advantage in a close contest. |
Storylines to Watch
And last but not least, here are the main storylines to watch out for during the game!
- Can Indiana adjust to L.A.’s defensive scheme without Caitlin Clark? The Sparks have thrown aggressive perimeter traps at Kelsey Mitchell and shown a willingness to switch across 1–3 to disrupt dribble hand-offs. Without Clark’s ball-handling to relieve pressure or stretch defenses from deep? Indiana needs better off-ball movement and quicker decisions from Kristy Wallace and Erica Wheeler to avoid stagnant half-court sets.
- Which second unit holds up during transition-heavy stretches? Both teams run close to 80 possessions per game, and the pace doesn’t drop much when starters sit. Indiana’s bench has logged fewer points per game than L.A.’s over the last 5 matchups, and Temi Fagbenle is still ramping up. The Sparks have leaned hard on Rae Burrell and Layshia Clarendon for energy minutes, and if they can win those mid-quarter stints, it keeps Hamby and Jackson in fresher condition for when it’s crunch time.
- Can the Sparks fix their late-game execution at home? L.A. has dropped 7 of their last 9 home games, and a big reason is late-possession breakdowns. They’ve rushed shots under pressure and allowed mismatches to be exploited on switches. Against a Fever team that doesn’t turn the ball over much (league-best 12.1 TO/G), the Sparks need tighter sets, fewer isolation possessions, and better spacing if they’re going to steer clear of another fourth-quarter collapse.
Why We’re Backing the Fever Caitlin Clark-less
Final Score Prediction: Indiana Fever 88 – Los Angeles Sparks 83
Indiana’s offense has looked a lot more connected without Clark (sorry, Caitlin); they’ve been getting more touches per possession, have better off-ball movement, and fewer stalled possessions. Mitchell’s been freed up as the primary scorer, and the Smith-Boston duo has forced defenses to cover more ground with better floor spacing.
Unfortunately, L.A. can’t say the same on defense. They rotate late on shooters, overhelp on drives, and rarely close possessions with a rebound. Even when they’re putting up points? They give a lot back on the other end during close games on their home court.
Indiana has cleaned up its late-game execution, and their road numbers back it up. The Sparks can score, but they’ve let too many winnable games get away from them at Crypto.com Arena. If this one follows the recent patterns, Indiana’s structure and shot selection win out.
Best Bets Recap
- Fever –1.5: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Over 176.5: ⭐⭐⭐
- Fever ML: ⭐⭐⭐
Want to take a smarter approach to betting? Start by exploring sports betting strategies that can help you make more informed decisions, manage risk, and spot value in the odds. Whether you’re new to betting or looking to sharpen your game, the right betting tools and information make all the difference. And when you’re ready to put your strategy into action, check out our best sportsbooks page to find trusted platforms with competitive odds, fast payouts, and reliable support.
Toluca vs. New York City FC Match Preview & Prediction (August 5, 2025)
New York City FC and Toluca will square off at Yankee Stadium on Tuesday, and this one? It could decide the fate of the Leagues Cup.
Toluca is fresh off a comeback win over CF Montréal; they beat them 2–1 on Friday. NYCFC also started off strong and got a 2–0 win against Club León in their opener.
These two teams have never played each other before, and both are known for their distinct playing styles. Toluca is aggressive and attacks, and New York City FC is more defensive in its style.
It’s the final stage of group play, and both want to secure a spot in the knockout stage. Keep reading for a complete analysis, including recent form, the latest betting odds, players we are watching, injuries, team news, tactical preview, and our picks for the four best bets!
Match Details
- Competition: 2025 Leagues Cup – Group Stage
- Matchup: Toluca vs. New York City FC
- Date & Time: Tuesday, August 51, at 7:30 pm ET
- Location: Yankee Stadium, New York, NY
- How to Watch: Stream exclusively on MLS Season Pass via Apple TV
- Weather: Clear skies with temps around 78°F expected; perfect soccer weather!
Recent Form & Momentum
How have Toluca and NYCFC been playing? Here are both clubs’ stats for the last five matches in all competitions:

Toluca
- W 4–3 vs CF Montréal (Leagues Cup)
- W (PKs) vs Columbus Crew (Leagues Cup)
- W 2–0 vs Juárez
- D 1–1 vs Pumas UNAM
- W 3–1 vs Puebla
They haven’t lost in five, and are scoring at a high clip, but are vulnerable to goals.

New York City FC
- W 2–1 vs Club León (Leagues Cup)
- L 1–0 vs Tigres UANL
- D 1–1 vs CF Montréal
- L 2–0 vs Inter Miami
- W 4–2 vs Charlotte FC
NYCFC has been up and down with its form, but the win over León was impressive.
Betting Odds
What does the market say about this matchup? Here are the latest betting odds and lines according to DraftKings:
Moneyline (3-way)
- Toluca +105
- Draw +285
- NYCFC +195
BTTS
- Yes -210
- No +165
Over/Under
- Over 2.5 (-200)
- Under 2.5 (+155)
Players to Watch
The players we’re watching? They’re the ones who could push the game one way or the other for their teams!
Toluca
- Paulinho (FWD): Paulinho poaches inside the six-yard box and times his runs really well between defenders. NYCFC’s center backs will have to stay tight or risk giving him easy tap-ins.
- Marcel Ruiz (CM): Ruiz is the anchor in Toluca’s midfield triangle. He’s the one linking quick one-touch passes into wide areas to spring counterattacks, and NYCFC will need to close him down early to break up their tempo.
NYCFC
- Alonso Martínez (FWD): Martínez likes to pull wide and then cut inside on his right. His movement between fullbacks and center backs created space vs León, and Toluca’s back line, which is less mobile, could get pulled apart if they don’t track him closely.
- Andrés Perea (CM): Perea is now NYCFC’s main outlet in the pivot, and he’ll be responsible for breaking up Ruiz’s rhythm and distributing quickly under a lot of pressure. If he gets overrun? NYC is at risk of losing control of the midfield altogether.
Injury Report & Squad News
Toluca comes onto the field at full strength. NYCFC is missing a few key pieces in its midfield and defense, and Toluca will try to exploit this.
Toluca
The full squad is available. Coach Hernán Cristante is expected to stick with the same core group that won their last two Leagues Cup games, so no rotation is likely because advancement is at stake.
NYCFC
- Out: Keaton Parks (central midfielder), Malachi Jones (wing depth), Thiago Martins (starting center back).
Parks and Martins are sidelined, so NYCFC’s backbone is weakened, particularly in buildup and defensive structure. Expect to see Perea take on more defensive midfield responsibility, and Justin Haak or Strahinja Tanasijević could fill in at the CB slot.
Tactical Preview
Time to talk tactics! As we said, both clubs play with different styles, so here’s what we are most likely to see in their forms.
Toluca lines up in an aggressive 4-2-3-1 or a fluid 4-3-3. They press high, circulate the ball quickly, and flood the flanks with overlapping fullbacks. When it works? They pin teams back and generate high shot volume. But the aggression they’re known for leaves them open behind the back line, and it’s usually when they’re forced to recover in transition.
NYCFC will likely go more conservative in a 4-2-3-1, sitting deeper and waiting for chances on the break. With Parks out, their midfield won’t carry the same control, so expect to see more direct play aimed at springing Martínez into space. Their best chances will probably come from quick counters or capitalizing on Toluca’s turnovers in the buildup.
Our Best Bets
Toluca’s attack is in sync, and NYCFC’s back line is still stretched a little thin. And that gives the edge to the Liga MX side in a game where chances should come at both ends. Look below for our top four best bets!
Bet | Pick | Confidence Level |
---|---|---|
Match Result | Toluca +105 | Medium-High |
Total Goals | Over 2.5 -200 | Medium |
Both Teams to Score | Yes -210 | Medium |
Anytime Goalscorer | Paulinho +140 | Low-Medium |
To make the smartest wager, start by confirming the official lineups, checking for any late-breaking injury news, and comparing odds from top sportsbooks to ensure you’re getting the best possible value.
Betting Analysis
- Toluca ML: They have a stronger structure on and off the ball, so Toluca has the advantage tactically and physically. They’re better at dictating the pace and exploiting space when teams can’t put together clean sequences. NYCFC’s missing starters only widen that separation.
- Over 2.5 Goals: Both sides push the tempo in different ways, and neither is built to sit back for 90 minutes. NYCFC needs to be more proactive at home, and Toluca’s direct play usually opens up matches, so this one favors a scoreline with multiple finishes.
- BTTS – Yes: Even if NYCFC gives up long stretches of possession, they’ve shown they can make a comeback. Expect them to take more risks if they’re behind, and Toluca’s high back line leaves enough room for them to find the net.
- Paulinho Anytime Goal: Paulinho has been the most active option inside the box for Toluca and usually gets several looks per match. Against a thinned-out back line? One clean chance would be all it takes to cash this prop.
Why Toluca Should Exit Yankee Stadium with the Win
Final Score Prediction: Toluca 2 – 1 NYCFC
Toluca is coming in with a stronger run of results and a more cohesive attack. NYCFC has made progress lately, but comes into this match short on defensive depth, with key absences affecting the back line.
We expect it to be a fast-tempo game with chances for both sides, but Toluca’s structure and depth give them the advantage here. The straight moneyline has value, but combining it with BTTS or Over 2.5 in a same-game parlay offers? That has a better upside!
Best Bets Recap
- Toluca ML (+105): Medium-High Confidence
- Over 2.5 Goals (–200): Medium Confidence
- BTTS – Yes (–210): Medium Confidence
- Paulinho Anytime Goal (+140): Low-Medium Confidence
Cincinnati Reds vs. Chicago Cubs Prediction & Best Bets (August 4, 2025)
Another summer series kicks off between the Cincinnati and Chicago Cubs! The Reds head to the Windy City for a three-game series starting at 8:05 on August 4.
The NL Central rivals take the field, and although the Cubs are slightly favored (home field advantage), do not count out the road dog Reds.
The Cubs are after the division title, and the Reds are trying to hold onto their place in the Wild Card race.
- Chicago is giving the ball to Mike Soroka, and his biggest hurdle? What happens once hitters get on base. Lefties have tagged him early in counts, and he’s had a hard time limiting innings after that. He doesn’t always work ahead, and when he’s forced into the stretch, the extra pitches pile up.
- Nick Lodolo is starting for the Reds, and he’s been more reliable with traffic. He fills the zone, changes eye levels, doesn’t let innings get out of hand, and he’s given the Reds 5–6 solid frames without needing early relief.
In this area? Lodolo gives the Reds a steadier hand, and the number on Cincinnati feels like it underrates that.
But we aren’t selling that short, so keep reading for our preview! We’ve got detailed pitcher stats, the latest betting odds and trends, main player/matchups to watch, and our picks for the three best bets!
Game Details
- Matchup: Cincinnati Reds (58-54) vs. Chicago Cubs (65-46)
- Date & Time: Monday, August 4, First pitch at 8:05 pm ET
- Location: Wrigley Field, Chicago, IL
- Venue Factor: Wrigley usually suppresses scoring when the wind isn’t blowing out, so check the weather before first pitch!
- How to Watch: Watch on MARQ, FDSOH
- Weather Forecast: Expect temperatures in the mid-70s °F, with light clouds or haze, and a low chance of precipitation.
- Season Context: The Cubs are 65–46 overall and have been strong at Wrigley (35–20), still pushing Milwaukee in the NL Central. The Reds are at 58–54 and under .500 on the road (25–28), and are after a spot in the Wild Card race.
- Head-to-Head This Season: Cubs are ahead 2–1; Chicago won the last game.
Starting Pitcher Stats
Who’s heading out to the hill for the Reds and the Cubs? Below is the starting pitcher for each club and a breakdown of their skills!

Nick Lodolo – Reds (LHP)
- 2025 Stats: 8–6, 3.09 ERA, 1.12 WHIP, 103 K in 95 IP.
- Recent Form: Lodolo has gone six or more innings in three of his last four starts, and he cuts down on free passes and forces grounders.
- On the Road: He has a 2.75 ERA away from home and has kept the Cubs’ lineup contained in previous meetings.
- Matchup Fit: His low-zone approach plays really well at Wrigley when the ball isn’t carrying.

Michael Soroka – Cubs (RHP)
- 2025 Stats: 3–8, 4.87 ERA, 1.39 WHIP, 76 K in 89 IP.
- Recent Form: Soroka has been giving up base runners with high pitch counts and hasn’t gone beyond the fifth inning in recent outings.
- Home Numbers: His ERA climbs to 5.25 at Wrigley, and those margins get thin if you fall behind in counts.
- Against the Reds: Allowed five runs over 4.1 innings the last time he faced the Reds.
Current Betting Odds
If you’re betting on this game, you need to know the odds and lines! Here they are, courtesy of ESPN BET:
Bet Type | Reds | Cubs |
---|---|---|
Moneyline | +120 | -145 |
Run Line | +1.5 (-190) | -1.5 (-160) |
Total | Over 7.5 (-125) | Under 7.5 (+105) |
Markets Overview
Moneyline
- The Cubs are at –125 at most sportsbooks.
- The Reds range from +110 to +125.
- The implied win rate on Cincinnati hovers around 46%, but model projections have them closer to 51%.
Run Line
- The Reds +1.5 (–182) gives you a little bit of a cushion, but the return isn’t great.
- Cubs –1.5 (+155) pays out better if they pull away, but that all hinges on Soroka holding up and the offense showing up.
Total Runs (O/U 7.5)
- The Under has been a decent angle when Lodolo starts.
- The Cubs remain below average against lefties; they’re in the bottom 10 in OPS vs LHP.
- The weather doesn’t look like it’ll play into scoring; moderate temps and low wind are expected.
Main Players & Matchup Trends
- Elly De La Cruz (Reds): Leads team in steals and triples; hit .312 in July.
- Spencer Steer (Reds): 17 home runs, 70+ RBI.
- Pete Crow-Armstrong (Cubs): 25 HR, 27 SB; hits against lefties well.
- Cody Bellinger (Cubs): Batting .211 since July 15.
Team Betting Trends
- Reds: 4–1 ATS in last 5 road games; 6 of last 8 have gone under.
- Cubs: 3–6 ATS in last 9 home games; bullpen gave up 3+ ER in 4 of last 7.
Our Best Bets
What do we think looks good for this game? We’ve got our sights set on three best bets!
Bet | Confidence Level | Why Do We Like It? |
---|---|---|
Cincinnati Reds +120 | Medium | Lodolo is the better starter, and Cincinnati is priced well as an underdog. |
Under 7.5 (+105) | Medium | Both teams have a hard time against lefties, and the Reds have leaned under in recent games. |
Pete Crow-Armstrong Over 0.5 Hits (-190) | High | Crow-Armstrong is hitting over .310 vs. left-handers; he likely gets two at-bats off Lodolo. |
Want a bonus angle? You got it!
- Same-game parlay: Reds ML + Under 8.5 → Pays around +290 depending on the sportsbook.
Lines can move fast before the first pitch, so staying updated is key. To make the most of your bets, check out our top-rated sports betting sites for the best odds and value.
Why We’re Taking the Reds as Road Dogs
Cincinnati has some real value in the series opener as the road underdog. Why? Because Lodolo’s been really reliable in the last month. He’s keeping the ball on the ground and limiting mistakes. And at Wrigley Field, that plays. Soroka hasn’t made it through six innings in weeks and has gotten into trouble once runners get on base.
The total looks playable, too! The Reds skew under with Lodolo on the hill, and Chicago hasn’t done very much hitting against lefties this season. Add in calmer weather and two lineups that don’t usually walk, and you’ve got a setup where one or two early hits could very well decide the game.
As for props, Pete Crow-Armstrong’s splits against left-handers are strong enough to believe in. Even if Lodolo keeps the ball down, Crow-Armstrong hits lefties well enough to get one through or beat out an infield single.
Best Bets Recap
- Reds ML (+120): Medium
- Under 7.5 (+105): Medium
- Pete Crow-Armstrong Over 0.5 Hits (–190): High
Final Score Prediction: Cincinnati Reds 4, Chicago Cubs 2
We feel like Lodolo will keep the ball out of the air, Soroka will fade after the third inning, and the Reds will grab the opener!
NFL Overseas Expansion: How International Games Could Change Betting Strategies
The NFL isn’t content with taking over every Sunday, Monday, and Thursday night, nooooo. It already rules the roost in the U.S., but that’s not good enough! It wants to go global. That’s right, y’all; America’s favorite game (that would be football) is expanding overseas.
Now Europe will have two versions of football, but they call soccer football, so it could get confusing.
Back to the point! What began as a one-time, then once-a-year novelty game in London is taking place all over Europe. Joining the rotation? That would be Germany, Ireland, and Spain are on deck. Brazil wants in as well! And that’s amazing for global fans of the game.
But for bettors in the U.S.? It means recalculating everything about your strategy.
International games won’t be the same. Why? A little thing called time zones. Ever had jet lag? Ever had jet lag and tried to play a whole football game? See what we mean?
Practice routines will be interrupted, stadiums will be strange and unknown territories with no home team fans, and the weather is also a factor. What was once a neutral curiosity on the calendar will become something that can change spreads, derail props, and throw totals right out the window!
If you are a football fan and want to stay ahead of the curve? This is for you! We are going to explain every detail about how NFL overseas games will screw up players’ performance, change the odds and lines, and how bettors can adjust before the markets do!
NFL’s Overseas Expansion: Where We Stand
The NFL’s push to grow internationally began in 2007, when the Miami Dolphins and New York Giants faced off at Wembley Stadium in the league’s first-ever regular-season game played outside the U.S.
At the time, it felt like a one-off game that was built for marketing and optics. But that matchup brought in over 80,000 fans, despite the heavy rain and a mud-soaked pitch, and it proved that there was a real appetite for American football abroad.
That game laid the groundwork for what would become the NFL International Series, which has only grown steadily over almost 20 years. Since then? The league has held more than 40 regular-season games across London, Mexico City, and, most recently, Germany!
Where It’s Going in 2025
The 2025 NFL season will feature seven international games, and that’s the most in league history! The locations span the following five countries:
- United Kingdom: Three games (two at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, one at Wembley)
- Germany: Two games (one in Munich, one in Frankfurt)
- Brazil: One game at Neo Química Arena in São Paulo
- Spain: First-ever NFL game in Madrid, at the Santiago Bernabéu
- Ireland: One game in Dublin, likely at Croke Park or Aviva Stadium
The above additions mark the NFL’s clearest signal yet that global expansion is part of the league’s long-term plan. The days of one or two games tucked into the October schedule are over, and they’re now strategic, branded events with marketing reach, international partners, and growing local fan bases.
A Long-Term Plan for Europe (and Beyond)
Commissioner Roger Goodell has made the league’s ambitions known. He’s publicly floated the idea of a four-team European division, and in the past has suggested that London alone could support two full-time franchises. While the logistics are still really complicated, travel, player contracts, time zones, and visa rules among them, the NFL is moving closer to some kind of permanent international footprint.
That future could involve new expansion teams or a relocation from a current U.S. franchise. Either way, bettors should be getting ready for a landscape where NFL overseas games aren’t the exception; they’re going to be part of the standings and the futures markets.
Global Marketing Rights: A Key Piece
Supporting this push is the NFL Global Markets Program, which was launched in 2021. It allows teams to establish marketing partnerships and fan engagement campaigns in certain countries. As of now, 29 of the 32 NFL teams have international marketing rights.
- The Jacksonville Jaguars have long been tied to London, and they’ve officially secured UK rights through this program.
- The New England Patriots hold exclusive rights in Germany, where they’ve already hosted fan festivals and built a sizable local following.
- Other teams have targeted Mexico, Australia, Brazil, Canada, and South Korea, planting the seeds for long-term fan growth.
Travel Fatigue & Time Zone Impact on Performance
Jet lag and hectic travel itineraries can be brutal, and they have real effects on NFL teams. Crossing multiple time zones disrupts players’ body clocks and can sap performance.
Sports science shows that when athletes compete outside their normal circadian rhythm, they suffer more than just mental lapses; their physical strength and reaction time decline when they’re off schedule.
We’ve seen this in practice: for years, West Coast teams were notorious for struggling in early 1:00 pm ET kickoffs in the East, and East Coast teams usually aren’t at full form when they play in late-night games out West.
Now amplify that effect for overseas trips, where teams might be 5–8 hours off their usual time. The result? Sluggish starts and underprepared play. Teams coming back from London without a bye week have usually underperformed: in a small sample, those post-London teams scored fewer points than expected and allowed more points than expected, a pattern that’s consistent with a tired, jet-lagged squad.
In 2023, when the Bills played the Jaguars in London, Jacksonville stayed in the UK for two weeks (having played the week prior), and Buffalo didn’t arrive until Friday morning, which was barely 48 hours before kickoff.
The Bills came out flat, and coach Sean McDermott admitted their energy “was not good enough early in the game,” vowing to re-evaluate travel plans the next time.
Bettors should adjust point spreads or totals based on these kinds of rest/travel disparities. If a West Coast team has to fly to London (or a team like Buffalo travels on a short week), think about the toll it takes on them: fatigued teams could start slow, and their odds of covering large spreads drop. Don’t ignore the hidden bye week dynamics either! Some teams now choose to play the following week instead of taking an immediate bye, but as history shows, that can be risky. Always check how much rest and prep time each side has had when you’re handicapping an international game.
Stadium Atmosphere & Crowd Dynamics
One of the most striking things about NFL games abroad is the truly unique crowd atmosphere. These are neutral-site games in every sense of the word: the usual home-field advantage is absent.

The stands are filled with a mix of fans wearing all sorts of NFL jerseys (not just those of the teams playing), and that’s a vibe that’s closer to a Pro Bowl crowd than a rowdy partisan NFL stadium.
European fans also tend to cheer both teams’ big plays and don’t necessarily observe the same etiquette (like remaining quiet when the offense is at work). This can cause some unusual moments, like a “home” team in London could still need a silent snap count because the crowd noise isn’t strictly in their favor.
From a betting perspective, this means you should give little to no boost for home-field in NFL overseas games. And those results bear that out: since 2007, favorites have won about 65% of London games straight up, roughly the same as normal, and favorites are almost exactly .500 against the spread in London. The neutral setting hasn’t produced a major bias for favorites or underdogs overall.
What has been really notable is that most London games feel flat, as they lack that usual home energy or urgency, and that works in favor of the underdogs.
And European crowds all have their own style. They’ll do the wave, cheer at strange times, and create a spectacle, which can only help underdogs who don’t have to deal with a hostile road environment. Momentum can change without a true home crowd to quell it, so live bettors can find value in spotting an underdog gaining confidence in a neutral atmosphere. If you’re handicapping these games? Take away the typical 2-3 point home-field advantage. Treat it as a bowl game at a neutral site, where raw team quality (and travel adaptation) matters way more than crowd support does.
Weather, Turf, and Stadium Conditions
Overseas venues also introduce unfamiliar field conditions and weather factors that bettors need to be aware of! London games have been played at both Wembley Stadium and Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, and there’s a huge difference: Wembley has a natural grass pitch, and Tottenham uses a replacement artificial turf surface for NFL games.
That turf at Tottenham? It drew loud complaints; after a 2023 game there, Buffalo Bills players called it “f–king cement,” as the normal grass was swapped out for a harder artificial field to protect the soccer pitch. Hard or slick turf can impact play with slower cutbacks, different cleat choices, and potentially higher injury risk (which could affect in-game betting if players go down).
The German venues used in Munich and Frankfurt have been grass, but those weren’t great either. In the NFL’s first Munich game (2022), players and coaches griped about the slippery grass at Allianz Arena; it was so bad that the field had to be replaced afterward. By 2023, in Frankfurt, the NFL installed a hybrid grass system to prevent similar slipping issues after learning from Munich.
The turf issues can influence totals and props: a slick field could lead to more conservative play-calling (fewer deep cuts on routes) and lower scoring, whereas a rock-hard, fast surface could favor offenses (but also possibly cause more field-goal attempts if drives stall on unfamiliar footing).
The weather is another factor. London is known for rain and damp conditions in autumn, and the very first London game in 2007 turned into a muddy slog, a 13-10 game played on a soaked field at Wembley. Although the field quality has improved since that “mudfest,” you still see rain impact some UK games (wet footballs causing fumbles or drops).
Bettors should treat the weather forecast in London or Germany just as seriously as they would for, say, Chicago or Green Bay. Totals for international games have usually skewed lower, and it’s partly due to weather and partly travel fatigue. The under has hit in 17 of 33 London games through 2023, and the last four London games (through 2023) all went under, averaging just 43.5 total points.
Some of it is timing (early kickoffs) and jet lag, but soggy European fall weather and unfamiliar wind patterns in open soccer stadiums do play a part. And consider altitude if the NFL returns to Mexico City (Estadio Azteca’s thin air has its own effects), though Mexico games are on pause until the stadium is renovated. Do your homework on the venue: grass vs. turf, recent field conditions, and forecasted weather. The factors could tilt a prop (e.g., favor a running back’s yards if receivers will be slipping in routes, or vice versa) or make a difference on the over/under. And if you hear players openly complaining about a field pre-game, don’t ignore it; it could be an omen of a sloppy, lower-scoring affair.
Bookmaker Adjustments & Market Inefficiencies
Whenever the NFL ventures into new territory (literally), bookmakers have to adjust their lines, and that means opportunities for sharp bettors. By now, oddsmakers are aware of the basic trends in international games, but that doesn’t mean they always get it right. One notable trend has been on totals: as mentioned, a slight lean toward unders in London historically (about 52% unders) and several low-scoring games in recent years . Books will adjust totals down a bit for jet lag and unfamiliar settings, but there may still be value if you anticipate extreme scenarios (such as especially bad weather or two tired offenses). Watch the odds movement in the week leading up to an NFL overseas game.
The public might not fully account for travel factors until closer to kickoff, so early lines could be soft. For example, if you knew the Jaguars would stay in London and the Bills would take a red-eye flight, you could have grabbed Jacksonville as an underdog before the market adjusted. In that 2023 game, bettors who got ahead of the news profited when the Jags won outright as +5.5 underdogs (the line closed a bit tighter as sharp money came in on Jacksonville).

Another potential inefficiency is public perception. Casual bettors sometimes overrate teams with international experience (“Oh, Team X has played in London three times, they’ll be fine”) or, conversely, panic about travel for teams that end up handling it well. Don’t blindly follow these narratives. A team like Jacksonville does have a routine for London, but it doesn’t guarantee a cover; the Jags have had mixed results despite basically being London’s home team (they’ve played a league-high 13 games in the UK). If the public inflates the Jaguars’ odds due to their London familiarity, you might actually get line value on the opponent. Always ground your bets in the fundamentals of the matchup plus the travel/rest info, rather than a simplistic “Team X is used to London” take.
Keep an eye on player prop markets as well, as these can be slow to adjust to overseas nuances. Sportsbooks will often set player props based on season averages, but we’ve seen top players underperform statistically in London games – for instance, in 2023, both Lamar Jackson and Ryan Tannehill had lower-than-usual passing yards in a London matchup, and Trevor Lawrence threw well below his average in one of his London games. Travel can disrupt timing and practice, which might mean fewer explosive plays (hurting overs on yardage props). Or a coach might rotate backups in more liberally if he senses players getting gassed by travel, which could affect snap counts for fantasy/DFS purposes. These are the kind of subtle edges where a bettor paying attention can profit. If you know a star player struggled with the long flight (watch mid-week practice reports or local press), maybe fade his props or DFS usage. Meanwhile, books sometimes over-adjust in other areas, like assuming there will be a huge drop-off in offense and setting the total ultra-low, even when two high-powered teams might still find ways to score. If you see an over/under that’s been hammered down due to narrative, and you have reason to think it’s overblown, don’t be afraid to go contrarian.
Lastly, line timing is super important. International games often kick off at unusual times (like 9:30 am Eastern on Sunday), which means line movement can happen late Saturday or very early Sunday when casual bettors finally notice the game. Sharp bettors who act before the crowd can catch lines before they move. The overseas effect is still somewhat new, so occasionally sportsbooks misprice the situation. For instance, historically, bettors didn’t account enough for jet lag on teams the week after London, but analysis showed those teams often underperform the next game, a nugget you could exploit in advance. Stay informed on travel schedules, read quotes from coaches/players about the trip, and look for any market overreaction or underreaction. International games add volatility, and with volatility comes opportunity for those who are prepared to seize it.
DFS & Prop Betting Nuances
NFL overseas games don’t just challenge bettors on spreads and totals – they also introduce wrinkles for daily fantasy sports (DFS) players and prop bettors. One big factor is how coaching strategies might shift due to the unusual circumstances. Some coaches take a simpler, more conservative approach in an international game, especially if practice time was cut short by travel. This could mean a run-heavy script or fewer elaborate trick plays, which in turn affects DFS output (e.g., fewer shootouts, more field goal drives). We’ve seen a tendency for London games to start slowly, as teams feel each other out (and shake off jet lag).
If you’re playing DFS showdown contests for a morning London game, consider that the first half might be low scoring. That could elevate the value of kickers and defenses in DFS lineups, relative to a typical game, and downgrade fringe big-play receivers who might normally rely on a high-flying game script. Conversely, some coaches might try to “make a splash” for the international crowd (there’s a theory that teams want to be ambassadors for the sport, possibly leading to a surprise onside kick or a 4th-down attempt to excite fans). But more often than not, they stick to what’s comfortable – no coach wants a long flight home after a failed trick play costs them a win.
Prop bettors should also monitor player usage closely. Travel-related factors can lead to limited usage of certain players.
For example, if a player is dealing with a minor injury, teams sometimes err on the side of caution and either leave them home or put them on a pitch count abroad. (It’s not uncommon to see a late-week injury update that a player “did not travel with the team,” which obviously means you should hit the under on any of his props.)
In 2024, the Chicago Bears ruled out safety Jaquan Brisker with a concussion, specifically noting he did not travel to London – an indication you wouldn’t see with a normal game. Keep an eye on those Saturday injury reports before an international Sunday; a surprise absence could open up value on overs for a backup’s props or unders for a player who might be less than 100%. Also consider fatigue in play-calling: a team that normally pushes tempo might slow it down if players are huffing and puffing. That could impact overs/unders on things like the number of plays, QB pass attempts, or receiver receptions (fewer no-huddle situations, more clock running).
DFS angles abound in these games. If you believe a team will come out sluggish, you might focus on a workhorse running back (assuming the team leans on the run in a simpler game plan) or even the opposing defense (a jet-lagged offense is prone to turnovers and sacks). If weather or turf is an issue, downgrade kickers on bad turf (we’ve seen missed kicks on unfamiliar fields) or upgrade possession receivers if deep passing is less effective. And remember, the game flow could be weird – some international games see low scoring early and then a flurry of points late once teams adjust. This opens opportunities for savvy live bettors or second-half DFS lineup pivots. Same-game parlays should be built with an understanding that correlations might differ from a standard game: for instance, you might parlay an under on a QB’s yards with an under on the game total and an over on the opposing RB’s carries, telling a story that the QB’s team is jet-lagged and falls behind, leading to a grind-out game by the opponent. These nuanced approaches can pay off if you read the tea leaves (or in this case, the travel itineraries and practice reports) correctly.
Betting Strategies for International Games
What are some concrete adjustments that you can make when you bet on international NFL games? We’ve got five of them for you!

1. Monitor Travel & Rest Days
Always factor in how and when each team traveled. Did one team fly out early in the week while the other left Thursday or later? Is one coming off a bye or long rest? These details matter. Give a boost to the team with more recovery and prep time, and be cautious with teams on short rest or extensive travel (especially west-to-east travel, which is harder on body clocks). If a team has to play the very next week after an NFL overseas game, consider fading them or adjusting the spread; the fatigue factor is real, as history shows in their ATS performance.
2. Fade Public Perception
The betting public often latches onto simplistic narratives in these games. For example, “Team X always wins in London” or “Jet lag will destroy Team Y.” Use these to your advantage. If the public overrates a team’s overseas experience (like blindly backing Jacksonville just because of their UK familiarity), you might find line value on the other side. Conversely, if a team is getting no love because “they had a long flight,” but you have intel that they handled it well, you could snag a favorable number. In short, be contrarian when the public overcorrects for the travel storyline.
3. Watch Line Movement Early
Keep a close eye on line moves as soon as the matchup is set. Oddsmakers will post an opening line often not fully incorporating the travel nuances; those moves will happen when sharp bettors weigh in or news comes out. If you have a strong angle (like you know one team historically struggles with long trips or a coach openly hates the disruption), bet early before the books adjust. By Sunday morning of a London game, the line may have shifted several points if significant money or news (like a player not traveling) hits the wires. Be ahead of that curve.
4. Limit Unit Size on Unknowns
With less predictability comes more variance. These games can be volatile – weird things happen overseas (strange bounces on unfamiliar fields, players cramping from travel, etc.). If you’re unsure how a team will handle the trip or the conditions, consider scaling down your bet size compared to a normal game. It’s okay to have a lean, but acknowledge the higher uncertainty. Think of it like betting on a bowl game in college. You do your research, but you accept that there are extra variables. Preserve your bankroll by not overextending on a game that carries more unknowns than a regular NFL game.
5. Focus on Totals & Second-Half Bets
One of the clearest patterns in international games has been sluggish starts followed by chaotic finishes as fatigue sets in. This opens two avenues: Totals and 2nd half wagers. If you anticipate a low-scoring start, you might bet the first-half under or wait to live-bet an adjusted total. Some bettors also have found success playing second-half overs, figuring that defenses wear down more than offenses late (jet lag can kill your concentration on tackling). Additionally, if one team was jet-lagged and fell behind early, the second half might see them in catch-up mode, and that’s good for a live bet on them to cover a bigger spread or to push the game over the total. Use what you observe in the first half: is one team clearly tired and slow? Did the commentators mention players looking gassed? Adjust at halftime, as there can be value in 2H lines before the bookmakers fully account for the fatigue factor that you’ve identified. Remember, a lackluster first half in London (perhaps a 6-3 score) doesn’t mean the game can’t explode in the second; sometimes teams find their footing and points pour in late. Being nimble and ready to strike on second-half lines can turn a profit in these unique games.
What If the NFL Adds an Overseas Team?
The NFL’s international ambitions don’t stop at a few games each year; the league has openly speculated about a permanent overseas team or even a European division in the future. It might sound far-fetched, but let’s play it out: What would it mean for bettors if, say, the London Jaguars or a Frankfurt franchise became reality?
- First, the logistics would create some wild scheduling quirks. A London-based team would likely face an imbalance of home and away stretches. They might play a bunch of home games in a row (to minimize back-and-forth travel) and then embark on a multi-week US road trip. In fact, NFL officials have suggested a possible formula: a European team could have two big U.S. road trips per season, one of two games and one of three games, rather than flying across the Atlantic eight separate times. As a bettor, you’d have to account for those blocks of travel – e.g., maybe that team performs decently in the first game of a long U.S. trip but wears down by the end of it. Home games for an overseas team could become a huge advantage if visiting teams struggle with the time change. A sleep expert theorized that a London team’s players would acclimate to the travel demands over time, potentially giving them an edge when U.S. teams come to visit.
- The “jet lag penalty” might change; the London team could handle it better, and every opponent is dealing with a one-off hardship. We could see point spreads for London home games shaded a bit more toward the home team than a typical home-field advantage. That London team’s away games would be brutal; every road game involves a transatlantic flight. You could see them favored at home frequently, but big underdogs in a lot of road spots, especially if playing in the U.S. West Coast (think of a London team at Seattle; that’s body-clock hell).
- For season-long bets, this introduces both opportunity and risk. Win totals for the overseas team might initially be set cautiously by books, as nobody’s sure how they’ll handle the travel gauntlet. There could be value in betting extreme outcomes; maybe they crush at home and steal a couple of road wins, going over their win total, or conversely, they could flame out due to travel fatigue and underperform. Futures like division odds or making the playoffs would be interesting: would the market underrate them because of travel concerns, or overrate them because of a presumed home advantage? Until we have data, astute bettors would need to read between the lines. Pay attention to how the team manages logistics (do they base in the U.S. for parts of the season? Do they invest in sleep science heavily?). Those could be clues to whether they’ll exceed expectations or not.
- Individual player performance and awards (MVP, etc.) could also be affected. A star quarterback on a European team might put up great numbers at home but struggle in some road games after long flights, potentially hurting season-long stats or consistency. Voters might subconsciously discount players on an overseas team if that team has an uneven schedule. This could make betting on awards for those players tricky. On the other hand, if an overseas team is competitive, it could be a compelling story – imagine the narrative of a London team making a playoff push despite the travel; a coach of the year nod could be in play.
- There’s also the betting public’s bias to consider. Many casual bettors might simply fade a Europe-based team in the early going (“no way they can handle all that travel”), but if you have reason to believe otherwise, like the team is built with depth and a smart travel plan, you could profit by going against that public bias. The reverse could happen too: a novelty factor where the public supports the overseas team out of fascination, skewing lines in their favor undeservedly. As always, your edge will come from knowledge and not emotion. If the NFL adds an overseas team, treat it as a new market inefficiency waiting to be solved. We’ll have to recalibrate ELO ratings for that team’s home vs away splits, and bookmakers will, too!
Are You Ready for the NFL’s Next Betting Frontier?
The NFL’s international presence is expanding, and so are the betting opportunities that come with it. What used to be one token London game per year has turned into a full schedule of NFL overseas matchups, each with its own challenges and variables.
For bettors, this means that their old strategies could use a tune-up. Travel, turf, and time-zone chaos can render a straight statistical comparison incomplete. The smart bettors will be the ones who incorporate the new factors into their models: tracking line movement related to travel news, studying how teams historically perform after long trips, and adjusting risk when unpredictability is high.
Are you changing with the NFL as it enters this next frontier? It could look like backing off a heavy favorite who just flew 5,000 miles, or hopping on a total that doesn’t reflect a looming London downpour. It could mean getting up early to live-bet a groggy first quarter, or digging into a beat reporter’s notes about how a team spent its week in Munich.
As the NFL’s global future unfurls, with talk of more games in far-flung locales and permanent NFL overseas teams, bettors who evolve alongside the league will find the best angles.
The NFL isn’t confined to U.S. soil anymore, and that means your betting playbook shouldn’t be, either!
You can turn the NFL’s international experiments into your betting advantages. The next time you see “LOCATION: London (or Berlin, or Mexico City)” on the schedule, don’t sigh and skip the game! If you use the right approach, you’ll be more than ready for the NFL’s next betting frontier, wherever in the world it happens to go next.
Minnesota Lynx vs. Las Vegas Aces Preview & Prediction (August 2, 2025)
It’s a reeeeematch (you have to say it like a DJ says reeeemix or this doesn’t work). It’s gonna be a doozy, because the Minnesota Lynx are heading to Vegas to play the Aces again. And the Lynx have already beaten them twice.
We’re two-thirds through the regular WNBA season, and the Aces are 7th in the standings, which is way behind the first-place Lynx. They just picked up a 89–74 win over the Sparks, led by A’ja Wilson’s 34 points and a defense that held L.A. to 4-of-24 from three.
The Lynx beat the defending champs, the New York Liberty, 100–93 behind 30 points from league scoring leader Napheesa Collier. Minnesota hit 15 of 31 from three in the win.
Collier and Wilson are both MVP front-runners, the Lynx are this close to being the No. 1 seed, and the Aces need to up their game.
It’s the year of the Lynx, and they’re the hands-down road favs, but can the Aces stop their rampage?
Keep scrolling to see team form, season stats, the latest betting odds, H2H, player matchups, advanced metrics, our picks for the three best bets, and a bonus prop!
Game Details
- Matchup: Minnesota Lynx (23–5) at the Las Vegas Aces (14–13)
- Date & Time: Saturday, August 2, at 3 pm ET
- Venue: Michelob ULTRA Arena, Las Vegas, NV
- How to Watch: ABC (national) and ESPN+ (streaming)
- The Stakes: Minnesota leads the Western Conference with a 23–5 record, and Las Vegas is fighting for its life to stay near the playoff bubble at 14–13 in a crowded bracket
Team Form & Season Stats
How have the Lynx and the Aces been playing prior to this game? Let’s take a look:

Minnesota Lynx
- On a five-game win streak, with recent wins against some of the top teams in the WNBA.
- Holding opponents to 78.9 points per game, and that’s the best mark in the league.
- They lead the WNBA in three-point percentage at 38.2%.
- They’ve won 11 of 13 road games, and that’s one of the best road records in the league.

Las Vegas Aces
- Sitting around .500 after a huge drop-off from last season’s performance.
- Offensive numbers are down; only 81.6 PPG compared to 92.8 last year.
- 3–5 in their last eight games. Wilson is still anchoring the team, but her scoring support has been hit-or-miss.
- Defensive rating has slipped to 9th, with perimeter rotations and transition coverage causing problems.
Betting Odds
Wanna put some cash on this matchup? Look below for the latest odds and lines posted on DraftKings:
Team | Spread | Moneyline | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Lynx | -5 (-110) | -230 | Over 167 (-108) |
Aces | +5 (-110) | +190 | Under 167 (-112) |
Line Movement (before the above latest lines)
- The spread opened at Lynx –4.5 and moved to –5.5 after early betting hit Minnesota.
- The total dropped from 166 to 165 as bettors reacted to the Lynx’s defensive form.
Head-to-Head Breakdown
Minnesota has outscored Las Vegas by a combined 45 points in two meetings this season, including a 31-point rout in their last matchup, which was Vegas’ worst loss of the year.
Season Series
- Game 1: Lynx 92, Aces 78
- Game 2: Lynx 88, Aces 57
Last 5 Matchups
- Minnesota is ahead 4–1 vs. Las Vegas
ATS Record in Series
- The Lynx are 4–1 covering against the Aces during that stretch
Main Player Matchups
23.8 PPG, 9.6 RPG, 2.1 SPG: Collier works best facing up from the high post and attacking gaps before help can rotate. Minnesota runs angled screens and slips to get her space at the elbow, where she can shoot, drive, or hit cutters. Defensively, she plays early help and anticipates entry passes, which disrupts Vegas’s rhythm when they try to get A’ja set on the block.
22.4 PPG, 9.1 RPG, 2.3 BPG: Wilson is being overloaded in the half-court. Without consistent movement around her, she’s seeing hard doubles off the catch and has to reverse pivot or pull up without spacing. Her shot timing is still on point, but the reads are delayed, and Vegas hasn’t created enough motion to give her clean isolation chances.
- Minnesota: Kayla McBride (42.1% from three) is a screen-heavy shooter who takes advantage of delayed rotations. If Vegas trails screens or hesitates to switch, she’ll find clean looks in rhythm coming off movement; Dorka Juhász anchors the rebounding effort and doesn’t need help boxing out. She’s quick to push the ball upcourt after a board, creating early mismatches before defenses set.
- Vegas: Kelsey Plum needs downhill touches. When she starts her actions from the wing with a live dribble, she draws secondary help and opens kickouts. If she’s relegated to spot-ups, Vegas loses its perimeter pressure; Jackie Young can’t get caught ball-watching. Minnesota uses weak-side movement and cuts to pull defenders out of position, and Young’s off-ball awareness has to be tighter to avoid giving up clean looks at the rim.
Advanced Metrics Breakdown
Want some advanced metrics? You got it!
Stat | Lynx | Aces |
---|---|---|
Offensive Rating | 109.4 (1st) | 101.1 (6th) |
Defensive Rating | 96.5 (1st) | 100.5 (9th) |
Net Rating | +12.9 (1st) | +0.6 (6th) |
Pace | 95.1 (10th) | 97.3 (4th) |
ATS Record | 16-11-1 | 11-16 |
O/U Record | 15-13 | 12-15 |
Our Best Bets
As for the best bets, we have three solid angles and a bonus prop that’s definitely worth a look!
Bet | Confidence Level | Why Do We Like It? |
---|---|---|
Minnesota Lynx -230 | High | Minnesota has outplayed Vegas in both meetings and is the more balanced team |
Minnesota Lynx -5 (-110) | Medium-High | Won by 14 and 31 in the previous matchups; still undervalued against Vegas |
Under 167 (-108) | Medium | Slower possessions and shot selection could keep this below the current line |
A’ja Wilson Over 20.5 Points | Medium | Should get the volume, and even with defensive attention, she finds her looks |
Final Thoughts
Final Score Prediction: Lynx 85, Aces 74
Minnesota’s depth and defensive discipline give them the advantage, and that’s why we add backing them to win. They’ve disrupted the Aces’ offensive rhythm in both previous meetings, limiting passing options and forcing contested shots. Vegas will need superhuman games from both Wilson and Plum just to stay in range.
If the Lynx control the pace by halftime? This could very well follow the same pattern as their earlier wins; smackdowns.
Best Bets Recap
- Lynx ML (–230): High
- Lynx –5: Medium-High
- Under 167: Medium
- A’ja Wilson Over 20.5 pts: Medium
Before placing your bets, always check the most up-to-date odds—lines can shift fast as game time approaches, so staying sharp could make all the difference. And to make sure you’re getting the best value, explore our list of top-rated sports betting sites.
Los Angeles Dodgers vs. Tampa Bay Rays Preview & Prediction (August 1, 2025)
When it comes to head-to-head results, the Los Angeles Dodgers are the clear favorites to win this game, having won 15 of their last H2H clashes. It has a 62.5% winning probability, much higher than the Tampa Bay Rays’ 37.5%, but H2H results don’t tell the whole story. The Tampa Bay Rays have the young fireballer Shane Baz on their side to take on the Dodgers.
Kershaw’s return for the Dodgers is something to look out for, especially with the Dodgers surging and the Tampa Bay Rays hovering at .500. We can also expect unpredictability on the home field due to the Tampa Bay Rays’ temporary venue change.
Game Details
- Matchup: Los Angeles Dodgers (63-46) vs. Tampa Bay Rays (54-56)
- Date & Time: Friday, August 1, 7:35 pm ET/ 4:35 pm PT
- Location: George M. Steinbrenner Field, Tampa Bay, FL
- How to Watch: Watch on MLB Network, FDSSUN, SportsNet LA
- Weather Forecast: 91° with intermittent clouds. Hot and humid conditions could favor offense, with warmer air aiding ball carry—especially meaningful in a hitter-friendly temporary venue.
Starting Pitching Matchup Breakdown
With Clayton Kershaw starring for the Los Angeles Dodgers and Shane Baz for the Tampa Bay Rays, here’s how the two players fare:
Clayton Kershaw (Dodgers)
- The player has a 4-2 record with a 3.62 ERA and 48 Ks in 47 innings.
- He is a veteran, no doubt, but has reduced velocity, especially since this season is his first post-surgery.
- We can expect high strikeout rates, as Clayton has a rich history of dominance with high strikeout rates against teams. And the Rays strike out 24.5% of the time.
Shane Baz (Rays)
- He is a young fireballer with an 8-4 record, a 4.61 ERA, and 112 Ks in 105 innings.
- His command has improved significantly, but we must note that he is still vulnerable to home runs and left-handed bats (LHB slash .284/.345/.515).
- Despite his impressive performance, Shane has yet to face a lineup as deep as the LA Dodgers in recent times.
Offensive Trends and Team Form
When it comes to offensive trends and team form, the Los Angeles Dodgers have the edge. Here’s how their performance has been:

Los Angeles Dodgers
- The team has won 7 out of its last 10 matches and averages 5.7 runs per game in the same period.
- We also have the Ohtani heat-up post-All-Star break with his 38-dinger, 73-RBI season, which are both team highs (.342 AVG, 6 HR in last 12).
- The Dodgers are also #1 in MLB when it comes to slugging against RHP

Tampa Bay Rays
- The team has a subpar performance in its last 10 games compared to the Dodgers. It won only 4 games and lost 6, and has also been inconsistent at the plate.
- While Yandy Diaz remains a steady force for the team, the lineup remains inconsistent.
- It is also worth noting that the team has struggled to manufacture runs without the long ball, a weakness that the Dodgers may exploit.
Head-to-Head and Historical Edge
The Los Angeles Dodgers have the edge when it comes to head-to-head stats. In its last 5 meetings against the Rays, the Dodgers have won 4 times, and its bullpen has held the Tampa Bay Rays to a .211 AVG in the last 6 matchups. We also get higher runs with the Dodgers at 118 compared to the Rays’ 94 (in their previous 24 head-to-head games).
Ballpark and Environment Factors
The Steinbrenner Field (AAA-level stadium) will play host to the Los Angeles Dodgers vs. Tampa Bay Rays clash. It has shorter dimensions that favor home run hitters. And the expected warm and humid weather could carry the ball.
As for the crowd, we expect the crowd to be the smallest for the Dodgers in three years. That’s because the game isn’t a true home match for the Tampa Bay Rays.
Live Betting Odds
Thinking about placing a bet on this matchup? Check out the latest odds and lines from FanDuel:
Bet Type | Dodgers | Rays |
---|---|---|
Run Line | –1.5 (+108) | +1.5 (-130) |
Moneyline | -144 | +122 |
Total | Over 9 (-122) | Under 9 (+100) |
Keep an eye on the odds—lines can shift quickly before first pitch, and staying updated gives you a better shot at locking in value before it moves.
Top Player Props to Consider
- Shohei Ohtani to Hit a Home Run—Excellent matchup vs. Baz’s four-seamer.
- Clayton Kershaw Over 5.5 Strikeouts – If healthy, Rays’ swing-and-miss tendencies could give him value.
- Yandy Díaz Over 1.5 Total Bases—Hottest bat for Tampa, likely to make contact vs. Kershaw.
Our Best Bets
1. Dodgers Moneyline – High Confidence
- Why we like it: The Dodgers are simply the better team in nearly every area—offense, bullpen, and defensive consistency. Kershaw, even at 80%, brings postseason poise and knows how to attack inexperienced hitters. Meanwhile, Baz has struggled against patient, powerful lineups like LA’s.
- Supporting Trends:
- The Dodgers are 16–5 in their last 21 interleague games.
- The Rays are 2–6 in their last 8 home games (though this is technically neutral).
- Watch out for: If Kershaw is pulled early due to pitch count, the Dodgers’ bullpen will need to hold strong. Still, LA’s bullpen ranks in the top 5 in xFIP.
2. Over 8.5 – Medium Confidence
- Why we like it: This ballpark (Steinbrenner Field) is smaller and favors hitters, especially with hot, humid Florida air in August. Both lineups have power threats, and Baz is prone to giving up multi-run innings.
- Offensive angles:
- The Dodgers average 5.2 runs/game vs. RHP.
- The Rays’ bullpen has allowed a 4.45 ERA in the past 30 days.
- X-factor: One early home run could break this open and force the losing team to chase—great for an over.
3. Shohei Ohtani HR or 2+ Bases – Medium Confidence
- Why we like it: Ohtani is red-hot and has a strong matchup vs. Baz, who struggles with lefties. Ohtani hits high-velocity fastballs (.321 AVG, .662 SLG vs. 95+ mph).
- Prop options:
- Safer play: Ohtani Over 1.5 Total Bases.
- Higher risk/reward: Ohtani to hit a home run (+400 range typical).
- Bonus angle: He may also walk or get hit by a pitch, but still expect him to be in RBI opportunities.
4. Dodgers -1.5 Run Line – Low Confidence
- Why we like it: If the Dodgers win, there’s a good chance it’s by more than one run. They have the offensive firepower to pull away late.
- However…
- The neutral-site field could limit crowd pressure.
- Tampa Bay has late-inning fights and plays tight games (over 50% of wins by 1 run).
- Use this bet if: You’re chasing +EV or want a parlay leg with higher payout potential.
Our Final Verdict: Experience Over Youth
Final Score Prediction: Los Angeles Dodgers 6, Tampa Bay Rays 3
The LA Dodgers have the firepower and, most importantly, the experience, which gives them the upper hand, even on the road. You can also expect Kershaw to go 5+ innings and hand off to a solid bullpen. The Rays, on the other hand, will likely struggle to string hits against LA’s lefty-righty mix.
Before betting on Dodgers vs. Rays or any upcoming game, take a look at our sports betting strategies and don’t forget to line shop with trusted sportsbooks—check our top sports betting sites.
The Underdog Advantage: How to Spot and Capitalize on Upset Opportunities
Although upsets are relatively rare in sports betting, there can be much to gain from making a successful pick on an underdog team or player—you can enjoy a much bigger payout than usual and get the satisfaction of spotting an opportunity that most other people missed.
Picking bets where you can take advantage of an upset can’t be done by the seat of your pants. Bettors who find these opportunities look at statistical analysis and head-to-head matchups on both teams or players involved in the wager. You must also understand the reason the lines move, be it for the legitimate likelihood of the outcome or the bookmakers trying to balance out the betting action.
We’ll discuss how to spot and capitalize on underdog bets where you can seize opportunities on upsets. Remember that these bets involve solid research and shouldn’t be used as a day-to-day strategy. Read our guide to betting upsets, and you’ll learn when to strike, the best ways to bet on an upset, and how to use stats and data to inform your approach.
What Is an Upset?
An upset in sports betting is an entirely unexpected result. It occurs when the team or player favored to win doesn’t come through. The underdog wins over the favored player or team (who should take them handily).
Betting on upsets means that you’re getting longer odds because the likelihood of the underdog outcome is less likely to happen. However, getting the bet on the underdog right results in a bigger payout than you’d get betting on your favorite team.
Steelers
Browns
-120
+230
In the example above, the Pittsburgh Steelers are heavily favored to win over the Cleveland Browns, and a $120 bet will profit $100. However, a $100 bet on Cleveland can yield a profit of $230 if they can pull off an upset over the Steelers. You can see that betting on Cleveland has longer odds, but you’ll profit more due to their unlikelihood of winning.
Betting on the underdog team can be much more profitable, but you cannot bet on the underdog willy-nilly and cross your fingers, hoping for them to win. Spotting good underdog betting opportunities with online sports betting is rooted in understanding why lines and odds change before the game and knowing how to identify overreactions in betting markets that create value. Additionally, researching each of your selections using statistical analysis and historical data is crucial. We’ll get into these ideas in the next section, so read on!
How Do You Predict an Upset in Sports Betting?
Before we understand the various strategies for predicting upsets in sports betting, know that upsets only happen occasionally. The favorite usually always wins, so you should expect to lose much of the time when you’re betting on upsets. Betting the underdog is inherently riskier, and you see this with the longer odds and larger potential payout. The excellent news about betting on upsets is that you don’t have to win every bet to make a profit.
Use these strategies and tricks for pinpointing upset opportunities and making the best picks possible:
Look at the Entire Context
The best bets are grounded in statistics and research—the key to long-term success in online sports betting. Working off your gut instinct, hunches, or what other people are anecdotally telling you doesn’t produce the successful results you’ll get from analyzing statistics and historical data. After all, studying prior teams’ or players’ history can be a good indicator of what could happen in the future.
So, what information are you looking into to inform these upset bets? A few of the critical factors you should be examining include the following:
- Keep in the loop on player injuries or suspensions. Sometimes, it doesn’t make much of a difference, but it could impact the outcome if it’s one of the key players. Injuries or suspensions on the favorite team, in particular, are reasonable indications that an upset is imminent.
- Check the weather before the game. If the forecast calls for snow, rain, or some other unideal condition, these are good times to bet on upsets because many of them occur during low-scoring games when the weather is terrible.
- Keep track of which teams have to travel. If the favorite team has to travel through a few time zones to get to the game, they are prone to poor performance due to jet lag or bad sleep.
Good research is your key to staying ahead of public betting sentiment and finding situations where upsets are likelier to happen. There’s still a place for betting based on your gut, but it’s only best when it’s coupled with numbers, historical data, and looking at the complete context of the game or matchup.
Use Data and Statistics to Analyze the Teams or Players
After looking at the entire context of the upcoming game or event, it’s time to research the teams or players who will be participating. Recent performances and current form can’t be emphasized when choosing your upset betting opportunities. Regardless of who the favorite or the underdog is, take some time to see how each team or player has performed recently. You can get a good idea of which momentum is moving, which could be a more accurate indicator of who will win.
Aside from determining where the primary momentum is going, there are a few other factors to consider before betting on an upset:
- Think about two teams facing off with a history of solid defense. It won’t be a high-scoring game, but these are fertile grounds for upsets.
- If the teams have opposite strengths, like the underdog being good at defense and the favorite being good at offense, an upset is less likely to occur. Look for teams with similar strengths—these bets are ripe for upsets.
- Consider betting on upsets if you’re dealing with a strong team with a super specific Achilles heel, like a quarterback who chokes occasionally.
- It’s essential to look at coaching, too. You might have a strong team with a coach who tends to follow the same strategies and style versus a weaker team with a coach who can better adapt to unexpected situations. These are prime opportunities to bet on upsets, too.
As mentioned before, looking for recent performances, such as the last five to ten games, can give you much insight into the team’s current form and the likelihood of how well they’ll perform in their next matchup.
The Importance of Line Movement
Upsets can be profitable for bettors because of the line movement in online sports betting. Knowing why lines move and how they affect value for the underdog team or competitor is the other half of successful upset betting that you’ll want to pair with the statistics and research you’re doing to inform your selections.
What Is Line Movement?
Line movement in sports betting occurs when the bookmakers adjust the odds, basically, the likelihood of each outcome, to accommodate changes like the weather, injuries, trades, coaching changes, or a switch in the venue. Line movement occurs sometimes because the bookmakers are attempting to accurately reflect the likelihood of who will win or lose.

However, line movement is influenced by how people bet on the game or match.
Bookmakers want relatively even action on either side of a bet to be profitable no matter the outcome. If the book sees that a lot of the public is backing the favorite, which happens all the time, they offer a reduced price on the odds for betting on the underdog to incentivize people to place bets on the dog. This creates value that appeals to those who are looking for a deal.
So, to balance the betting action, the books usually have odds that don’t truly reflect the likelihood of each outcome. This is why good research on your betting selections is essential. You can’t always trust the books’ numbers. The odds could actually signify the actual likelihood of who will win or lose, or they could be significantly skewed!
The Public Bets the Favorite
The casual betting public is usually drawn to wagering on the biggest names in sports and games where many points will be scored. This is why you see a lot of recreational bettors betting on your favorite team or competitor. You can find some good opportunities for betting on an upset with games like these, where a lot of the betting public will heavily favor one side because the books are bound to discount the odds for the dog—line movement. It can give you an excellent idea of what the public thinks!
Ways to Bet on Upsets
The best way to bet on upsets is with singles bets like money lines (betting on the winner), point spreads (betting the margin of victory), or over/unders (betting on the final combined score).
Money Lines
Money lines are bets where you try to predict the winner of the game correctly. Let’s go over an example of how you can successfully bet on upset for an upcoming football game between the Cincinnati Bengals and the Green Bay Packers:
Bengals
Packers
-220
+220
According to your favorite online sportsbooks, these are the odds of either team winning. The implied probability for each set of odds is as follows:
Bengals
Packers
68.75%
31.25%
You begin researching both teams to see if there’s a chance for an upset to occur here, where the Packers can win over the Bengals. This is what you find that indicates an upset is possible:
- The Cincinnati Bengals have won the last three games in a row, but they’ve been close each time.
- One of their linebackers is on suspension, which could affect the outcome, though it’s not sure.
- If you consult historical data and look at prior games between the Bengals and the Packers, you will find that the Packers have won quite a few games against Cincinnati.
Despite this research, the Bengals remain the favorite to win this upcoming game. However, based on the statistics and data you’ve reviewed, you give them a lower probability of winning. You give them a 1 in 5 shot of reigning victorious over the Packers, which translates into 20%. When you compare this with the implied probability of 31.25% of Green Bay winning, you smell an upset, but you’ll want to get the best price possible on the odds for betting, which shouldn’t be hard considering the situation at hand!
Knowing that the Bengals are favored to win, you know all too well that most of the public’s money will go toward Cincinnati, forcing the book to lower their price on the odds for Green Bay. When betting on the Bengals gets hyped up, watch for the odds to get longer but for the prices to go down in your favor. When the line moves, place your bet!
Point Spreads
One of the safer routes for betting on upsets is doing it through point spreads or handicap betting, where you’re trying to predict the margin of victory correctly. Bettors can get excellent value on bets where the favorite is expected to win by a wide margin. You’ll get a lot of casual bettors wagering on the favorite, thus creating some good value on the odds for the dog.
Let’s look at another example of the Cincinnati and Green Bay game to give you a little more context:
Bengals
Packers
–3.5 (-110)
+3.5 (-110)
Using standard American odds of -110, a bet for the favored Bengals to win means that they must win by over 4 points; otherwise, it’s considered a lost bet. Betting on the Packers results in a win if they win outright over the Bengals or lose by less than 4 points. If you’re dealing with two teams that are evenly matched when scoring points, you could be dealing with a game that could go either way, especially with a point spread this narrow.
Follow the steps outlined in our section on finding upset opportunities in moneyline betting and apply them to spread betting. Just wait for the line to move and then spring into action to get the best value possible.
Wrapping Up: Turning Underdog Insight into Betting Success
Betting on underdogs isn’t just about chasing big payouts—it’s about identifying value where others overlook it. Through careful research, understanding of line movement, and close attention to situational factors like injuries, travel, and recent performance, you can begin to spot upset opportunities that casual bettors miss. Upset betting may not produce frequent wins, but with a calculated approach, even a modest hit rate can yield long-term profitability.
Ultimately, success in underdog betting hinges on preparation and discipline. By combining statistical analysis with market awareness—like spotting sharp money or tracking public betting patterns—you equip yourself to bet smarter, not harder. Whether you’re new to betting or sharpening an existing strategy, learning how to capitalize on underdog value can give you a real edge in a market that often favors the favorite.
Phoenix Mercury vs. Atlanta Dream Preview & Prediction (August 1, 2025)
Brittney Griner will take on her former team since joining the Atlanta Dream. She averages 10.2 points with 5.7 rebounds, and let’s not forget that the Atlanta Dream team is also the best they’ve had in several years. The Dream took home the win in their last encounter against the Phoenix Mercury. But is Mercury prepared to make up for the last encounter that ended 79:90?
Mercury will go into the game with a loss against the Fever, while the Dream will have to fight off fatigue despite coming from a win on the road against the Wings. The Dream has also grabbed the win in its last three encounters on the road. But when it comes to season stats, both teams are on par, each taking 16 wins so far in the season.
As for the head-to-head stats, the Phoenix Mercury has the upper hand with 10 wins compared to the Dream’s 6 wins. These stats are based on their encounters for the past 6 years, which puts the Phoenix Mercury as the favorite, but let’s review even further.
Game Details and Context
- Matchup: Phoenix Mercury (16–10) vs. Atlanta Dream (16–11)
- Date & Time: Friday, August 1, at 8 pm MT / 10 pm ET,
- Venue: Gateway Center Arena, College Park, Georgia
- How to Watch: CBSSN nationally and WNBA League Pass
Here are some key storylines to keep in mind as we run through our pick for the game:
- Atlanta is playing back-to-back and without all-star Rhyne Howard.
- Phoenix is healthy and features Sabally, Copper, and Thomas, all ramped up.
- Home-court advantage key: Mercury 9-5 at home, Dream just 5-9 on the road.
Team Analysis
Both teams have fared well this season, but if we were to judge from the last five encounters, then the Atlanta Dream has the upper hand. The team has won four out of its last five matches, and all four have been on the road. The Phoenix Mercury, on the other hand, has won only one of its last five encounters. But those aren’t enough to pick the winner. Let’s consider the key team strengths and weaknesses.

Phoenix Mercury
The Phoenix Mercury has been impressive at home, grabbing 9 wins. Its defense and offense are formidable and evenly powered. Even better, the team has the third-best defensive rating in the WNBA.
A few key players that will likely give the Atlanta Dream a run for their money include Satou Sabally, Kahleah Copper, and veteran playmaker Alyssa Thomas. Note that Alyssa Thomas is not just a veteran playmaker but one with a strong inside-out presence.
Satou Sabally and Kahleah Copper are healthy on the back. Even better, you can expect a scoring punch from the duo in the game. The Phoenix Mercury looks all set with its star power, but we can’t say the same for the Atlanta Dream, which will also likely suffer from travel fatigue. The game with the Mercury will be its second night of a back-to-back.

Atlanta Dream
The Atlanta Dream team will go into the match without all-star Rhyne Howard. Rhyne averages 16.5 points per game and would have been a key force in the game. Her absence will undoubtedly limit the Dream’s scoring options and reduce its offensive power.
Despite Rhyne’s absence, the Atlanta Dream boasts a veteran frontcourt duo in Brionna Jones & Brittney Griner. We can expect experience from the duo, and coupled with Allisha Gray as the center of offense, the Atlanta Dream might just maintain their current win against the Phoenix Mercury in the head-to-head encounters. Allisha Gray enters the game with 23+ point/rebound lines in recent games.
Betting Lines and Trends
The sportsbooks have weighed in—here are the most up-to-date odds from ESPN BET:
Team | Spread | Moneyline | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Mercury | -3.5 (-105) | -155 | Over 166.5 (-105) |
Dream | +3.5 (-115) | +135 | Under 166.5 (-115) |
- ATS & O/U Trends:
- Dream: 3‑7 ATS last 10 games, under in 4 of 6 road games recently.
- Mercury: 6‑3 ATS last 9, 4‑1 ATS last 5 at home. Under has hit in 4 of the last 6 overall games.
Gameflow and Matchups
It looks like Allisha Gray will have to carry the Atlanta Dream in this game, as the team has a thin bench, size mismatch, and travel fatigue. And let’s not forget the absence of all-star Rhyne Howard.
On the other hand, the Phoenix Mercury has been much faster at home, and it’ll come into the game with a full, healthy roster. The team also has a stellar depth compared to the Atlanta Dream. It is likely to overwhelm the Atlanta Dream as its elite defense fends off the Dream offense.
Best Bets
✅ Bet #1: Phoenix Mercury -3.5 (-105)
Confidence: ★★★★☆
Rationale
- Phoenix has been dominant at home so far and is likely to carry on that dominance, especially with the Atlanta Dream facing second-leg fatigue. The Dream will also be without its key player, Howard, while Phoenix’s defensive pressure will make the line feel short.
- Another reason is because Phoenix has effortlessly covered wins by 9-12 in most projected outcomes.
✅ Bet #2: Under 166.5 (-115)
Confidence: ★★★☆☆
Rationale
- Both teams have trended under recently. And we can also expect a late-game blowout to curb the scoring pace.
- Another key factor in the scores is that the Dream will play without its key scorer, Howard. Add that to Phoenix’s stellar defense, and you can expect a half-court game.
✅ Bet #3: Phoenix Mercury -155 (for conservative bettors)
Confidence: ★★★★☆
Rationale
- There is a strong likelihood for the scoreline (~76–78%). It could also serve as a solid parlay leg.
- The bet is a good anchor for lower-risk same-game tickets or teaser scenarios.
Make sure to check the latest odds on our best sports betting sites before placing your Mercury vs. Dream bets—lines can move as tip-off approaches, and staying informed can help you find the best value.
Our Take: Lock in These Picks
Final Score Prediction: Phoenix Mercury 88 – Atlanta Dream 77
The Phoenix Mercury will have no stress covering, but the total stays under.
The Atlanta Dream goes on depleted and without adequate rest against a healthier Phoenix Mercury, which has also been dominant at home. You can expect a physical and lower-scoring control game.
When it comes to offense and defense, the Phoenix Mercury is a master of both and will likely outplay the Atlanta Dream. The Mercury also has better depth and energy levels compared to the Dream, which is on the second leg of its back-to-back on the road.
As for our top picks and confidence levels, here are the bets to consider:
- Mercury -2.5 (spread): High confidence
- Under 164.5: Moderate confidence
- Mercury ML (Moneyline): Solid parlay anchor
Monterrey vs. FC Cincinnati Prediction & Match Preview (July 31, 2025)
FC Cincinnati has a lot of balls in the air this summer! Their ambitions? Another Supporters’ Shield while kicking off a serious push for Leagues Cup silverware. Their tournament run starts Thursday night at TQL Stadium, where Pat Noonan’s squad will host LIGA MX heavyweight CF Monterrey in their group stage opener.
Cincinnati has the home advantage, and TQL Stadium has been good to them this season. But Monterrey ran through them in last year’s Concacaf Champions Cup. Both clubs have made changes, and the lines are almost even, so this one? It isn’t exactly a soft landing place for either team.
Who you got for this one? Keep reading for what we think about this matchup, betting odds, recent form, head-to-head stats, the players we’ll be watching, tactical breakdown, and our picks for the three best bets!
Match Details
- Matchup: CF Monterrey (Liga MX) vs. FC Cincinnati (MLS)
- Date & Time: Thursday, July 31, 7:00 pm ET / 4:00 pm PT
- Location: TQL Stadium, Cincinnati, Ohio
- How to Watch: Stream exclusively on MLS Season Pass via Apple TV (select US matches on FS1). In Cincinnati, listen on ESPN 1530 (English) or La Mega 101.5 FM (Spanish)
- Competition: Leagues Cup 2025, Phase One (Group Stage, Matchday 1)
Match-Up Overview
Let’s take a quick look at Monterrey and Cincinnati team-wise!

Monterrey
- Proven winners with a roster that’s built for tournament play
- They control possession through midfield depth and precision passing
- Clinical finishers, when given space and time in the final third

FC Cincinnati
- One of the strongest home teams in MLS this season
- They rely on physical play, quick transitions, and set-piece pressure
- Definitely motivated by last year’s 5–0 defeat to Monterrey in Concacaf competition
Recent Form & Head-to-Head
How have these two clubs been playing, and what’s their history?
Monterrey Last 5 Matches
- 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss
- Found the net in 8 in a row
- They remain vulnerable when away from home
Cincinnati Last 5 Matches
- 4 wins, 1 draw
- Unbeaten in last 10 at TQL (8 wins, 2 draws)
- Logged 5 shutouts during that stretch
Head-to-Head (all-time)
- Monterrey leads the series 2–0
- Last meeting: 5–0 on aggregate in the 2024 Concacaf Champions Cup
- This will be their first meetup at TQL Stadium
Players to Watch
There’s a ton of talent on this pitch; Monterrey’s experience and technical edge come through in key areas, and Cincinnati’s more direct, aggressive style puts pressure on other areas. Here’s who to keep your eye on!
Monterrey
- Sergio Canales: Central to the attack with precise passing and control in close spaces
- Rogelio Funes Mori: A reliable finisher who consistently converts chances inside the box
- Luis Romo: Links midfield and defense really well, and is great at disrupting counterattacks and initiating transitions
FC Cincinnati
- Luciano Acosta: Orchestrates Cincinnati’s buildup play, regularly finds gaps with well-timed passes
- Matt Miazga: Physical anchor in the back line, critical for defending Monterrey’s aerial entries
- Alvas Powell: Adds width on the right and looks to feed crosses into the box from advanced areas
Betting Odds
If you’re betting on this game, here are the latest odds and lines via DraftKings:
Moneyline (3-way)
- Monterrey +140
- Draw +250
- FC Cincinnati +160
Draw No Bet
- Monterrey -125
- FC Cincinnati -105
Over/Under
- Over 2.5 (-150)
- Under 2.5 (+120)
- Both Teams to Score (BTTS) – Yes: -180 | No: +145
Always check the most current odds before betting—lines can move quickly as kickoff nears, and staying informed could be the key to smarter wagers.
Tactical Breakdown
We’ll be watching a battle between control and disruption. Monterrey likes to dictate play with methodical buildup, and Cincinnati is more direct; they’re compact in shape, quick to pressure, and always looking to rush forward once they get the ball.
- Keeps the ball moving with purpose, and they patiently wait for small defensive openings
- Creates chances from set pieces and fast breaks after turnovers
- Midfield knows how to keep possession under pressure
- Stays organized defensively and presses with intensity in the middle third
- Uses quick outlets like Acosta and Barreal to break down the flanks
- They usually start out slower but generate chances later as space opens up
- Can Cincinnati disrupt Monterrey’s passing game without losing their shape?
- Will Monterrey leave too much room behind their wingbacks when they’re pushing forward?
- Humid conditions in Ohio could slow down the tempo and affect Monterrey’s stamina late in the game
Our Best Bets
Not sure what to wager? No worries, we have three solid-looking bets below!
Bet | Confidence Level | Why Do We Like It? |
---|---|---|
Draw No Bet – FC Cincinnati (-105) | 8/10 | Unbeaten in 10 at home and motivated to clap back after last year’s Concacaf loss |
Both Teams to Score – Yes | 7/10 | Attack-minded setups, and both teams have been finding the net regularly |
Over 2.5 (-150) | 6.5/10 | With so much talent on the pitch? It won’t take a lot for this to turn into a shootout |
Cincy’s Redemption Game? Our Final Verdict
Final Score Prediction: FC Cincinnati 2 – 1 Monterrey
Last year’s blowout? We know Cincinnati hasn’t forgotten. And this time, they’re on their own field, in better form, and have a tighter setup across the back.
Acosta is still the centerpiece, but Cincinnati also has stronger players around him, so he doesn’t have to go it alone. Monterrey will probably control long stretches of possession, but Cincinnati’s ability to break quickly and capitalize on openings? It makes this a winnable matchup.
We’re backing the home team with the Draw No Bet; it makes the most sense! Cincinnati’s been really strong at home and usually finds a way to finish chances when they have the openings.
Best Bets Recap
- FC Cincinnati Draw No Bet (-105): 8/10 confidence
- Both Teams to Score – Yes (-180): 7/10 confidence
- Over 2.5 Total Goals (-150): 6.5/10 confidence
Before placing your bet, double-check the confirmed lineups, review the latest injury updates, and compare odds across trusted sportsbooks to lock in the best value.
Robot Umpires & MLB Betting: Could Automated Strike Zones Shift Run-Line Bets?
Robot umpires could be coming to an MLB ballpark near you. Did you think that AI was only coming for non-sports jobs? The baseball players are safe for now, as the engineer overlords haven’t figured out how to make a coordinated one.
But the human umps? Their job security isn’t so secure anymore. And we aren’t exactly mad at the thought of automated strike zones. Umpires are human and make mistakes, and strike calls in the MLB still are judgment calls.
One night, a pitch at the knees gets the call, and the next night it doesn’t. It’s all part of the game, but it alters everything from pitch counts to final scores.
MLB has been tinkering with automated strike zones for years, and what started in the independent leagues is now a regular feature at Triple-A, and the league has already tested it in spring training.
Will it be full automation or a challenge-based system? We don’t know, and the MLB hasn’t said. But if it does happen, what will it mean for bettors? And run lines?
When the zone doesn’t change from game to game, pitcher performance, scoring patterns, and betting angles will all look different. So we are gonna look at the early data, what’s been changed at the minor league level, and what bettors should be aware of as the strike zone gets standardized!
What Are Robot Umpires?
If you’re thinking about a cute lil robot standing behind home plate wearing a tiny uniform of the standard dark slacks and short-sleeved polo shirt, we are sorry to tell you that’s not what it is. We were disappointed as well.

A robot umpire is a misnomer. As we said, we aren’t talking about R2D2 chilling at home plate. Nope, it’s an Automated Ball-Strike (ABS) system, and it’s a technology that uses radar or camera tracking to call pitches as balls or strikes with high precision. In practice, the system (like Hawk-Eye or TrackMan) measures a pitch’s location and relays the call to the human umpire’s earpiece instantly. The human umpire still signals the call, but they are just following the machine’s calls.
Robot umps have been tested extensively at the lower baseball tiers. The independent Atlantic League first used a full ABS in 2019, with a Doppler radar “black box” perched above home plate to call pitches. Since then, MLB has trialed ABS in affiliated minors: the Low-A Southeast League in 2021, some Triple-A games in 2022-2024, and the Arizona Fall League. The technology adapts for each batter’s height and stance, so a tall hitter’s zone is bigger than a shorter player’s, and it’s the same as the rulebook strike zone.
When could we see the majors see robot umps? MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred has indicated the earliest would be 2026 for a rollout. In Spring Training 2025, MLB used the ABS challenge system in about 60% of exhibition games as a high-profile test. Those spring games allowed each team two challenges (retaining them if successful), and about 52% of challenged calls were overturned by the ABS, implying umpires were indeed missing about half of the disputed pitches. While the full robotic strike zone won’t be part of the 2025 regular season, the writing is on the wall: the robot umps are coming, one way or another.
MLB’s experiments have evolved into a hybrid challenge system instead of total automation. In 2023-24, Triple-A leagues alternated between two modes: some games used full ABS (every pitch called by the system), and others used an ABS challenge system where the human umpire called the game, but teams could appeal a few ball/strike calls to the computer. The feedback was that players and fans strongly prefer having a human ump with limited tech assist over a completely robotic strike zone. The challenge system has been deemed a better balance between accuracy and the traditional “feel” of the game. By late 2024, MLB “pushed aside” full automation at Triple-A in favor of challenges, after observing some unintended side effects of the pure ABS (like an uptick in walks that we’ll talk about).
How Run-Line Betting Works in MLB
Ok, before we get into the betting impact, we need to do a quick refresher on run-line bets. A run-line is baseball’s version of a point spread. In a typical MLB game, the favorite is -1.5 runs (meaning they must win by 2 or more runs to cover), and the underdog is +1.5 runs (they can lose by 1 run and still cover, or, of course, win outright). This 1.5-run spread is almost always used as the default line, which is why you’ll see something like Yankees -1.5 / Red Sox +1.5 with associated odds. It adds extra complexity beyond the moneyline (which is just picking the winner) because it factors in the margin of victory.
How Run-line Bets Differ from ML and Totals
Run-line bets differ from moneyline bets in that you’re not just asking “who will win?” but “who will win, and by how much?”
If the favorite wins 3-2, a moneyline bettor on the favorite cashes in, but a run-line bettor on the favorite loses (since 3-2 is only a one-run win, not covering the -1.5 spread). Conversely, run-line underdog bettors often win bets on close losses. It’s a really popular wager type because it can turn heavy favorites into more profitable bets (if you’re confident they’ll win by 2+), and it gives underdog backers a cushion in a typically low-scoring sport where one run is huge.
Main Betting Factors
There are a lot of factors that influence run-line betting decisions.
- Pitching matchups are paramount; a great starting pitcher can suppress scoring, and that makes it harder for a favorite to pull away by 2 runs.
- Bullpen quality and late-inning tendencies matter if leads get extended or blown.
- Ballpark factors (a game at a hitter-friendly park like Coors Field vs. a pitcher-friendly park like Petco Park).
- The weather (wind blowing out vs. in) can sway expected run totals and thus the likelihood of a big margin.
Bettors also consider umpire tendencies, and we’ve now come full circle! There are umpires who have a reputation for a tight strike zone (favoring hitters and runs), and others who call a wide zone (favoring pitchers and unders).
All of these tendencies can influence scoring: If they call more balls, which results in additional walks, more runs can score. Other umpires can call fewer balls, and that could reduce the number of runs scored. Astute bettors will check who the home plate umpire is and adjust their over/under or run-line bets accordingly.
An analysis of umpire stats found that nearly half of the umps studied in a season showed a bias toward either overs or unders in total runs. For example, in 2010, Fieldin Culbreth’s games went over the betting total ~63% of the time (suggesting a smaller zone/hitter-friendly), whereas Doug Eddings’ games went over only ~33% (a big zone favoring pitchers and lower scores).
Sportsbooks are aware of these patterns and will shade totals for extreme cases, but it’s an extra variable in the betting equation.
The main point is this: human variability in calling balls and strikes is one of those factors that can change an MLB game’s run distribution. A generous strike call in a pivotal moment can kill a potential rally, and a tight zone can extend innings and boost scoring. That’s why a move to an automated strike zone stands to impact betting! It totally eradicates one source of volatility that bettors and oddsmakers have historically baked into betting lines.
Human Umpires’ Impact on Game Outcomes
Human umpires, for all of their experience and training, are not perfect or consistent. Every fan has seen a strike three call on a pitch a foot outside, or a pitcher lose a strike because the ump didn’t like the height or the catcher’s framing.
And inconsistencies aren’t anecdotal; they show up in the data.
In the 2024 MLB season, Statcast data showed that 10.9% of pitches thrown in the rulebook strike zone were called balls by umpires, and 6.3% of pitches outside the zone were erroneously called strikes. In other words, about 1 in every 10 true strikes was missed, and about 1 in 16 balls was mistakenly gifted as a strike. Over a full game with, say, 300 pitches, that’s on the order of 20+ potentially incorrect calls. Each one could change an at-bat outcome, which can snowball into changing innings and final scores.

Different Umpires, Different Calls
There’s also a big variation between different umpires. The strike zone is not actually a fixed rectangle in practice; it’s a human judgment influenced by habit and perspective. A study of umpire strike zones from 2008–2016 found that some umps consistently call many more strikes than others, especially on the edges of the zone.
Veteran ump Bill Miller was shown to call about 1,100 more strikes than the average umpire over a span of years; roughly 4 extra strikes per game, often on the fringes of the zone. He was the quintessential “pitcher’s umpire,” giving pitchers the benefit of the doubt on borderline pitches high, low, inside, and outside.
On the other end of the spectrum, there are umpires like Gerry Davis and Greg Gibson who have notably tight zones (sometimes called “hitter’s umpires”), calling fewer strikes than average, especially around the edges. The difference from one ump to another can be huge: analysis of 2017 data indicated the most pitcher-friendly ump was calling about 10 more strikes per game than the most hitter-friendly ump. That’s a huge factor in how a game might play out, as more strikes generally mean quicker outs, fewer walks, and typically lower scoring.
The tendencies impact not only totals but also how runs are distributed, which ties into run-line outcomes. An umpire with a tiny zone might contribute to more baserunners and potentially more big innings (as pitchers struggle to get strike calls and may have to throw easier pitches over the plate).
But an ump with a really generous zone could keep games tighter by suppressing offense, and teams might score less frequently, perhaps leading to more one-run games rather than blowouts. Bettors track umpire stats: historically, you could find umpire-by-umpire records against the total (over or under) and even how often favorites cover the run line under certain umps. As we said, almost half of the umpires in one sample leaned notably toward either higher or lower scoring games.
Extreme cases like Jim Reynolds (64% of his games went Over the total in 2010) or Greg Gibson (only 22% went Over, meaning 78% Under) show that an ump’s strike zone consistency (or lack thereof) can absolutely influence and change the margins of victory.
Famous (or Infamous) Examples
And of course, there are the headline-grabbing examples of umpire mistakes that altered baseball games. In a nationally televised game in April 2022, veteran ump Angel Hernandez had only 77% accuracy on strikes (well below the ~93% league average) and “rung up” multiple batters on pitches clearly outside the zone.
Phillies hitter Kyle Schwarber famously blew up at Hernandez after a called strike that was nowhere near the zone, and it was a demonstration of how a human umpire can inject chaos into such a crucial moment; blown calls can directly affect whether a team extends a lead or falls behind. Bettors who had the Phillies -1.5 in that game (just as an example) might feel that a missed ball four call, which should have been a walk (but became a strikeout), robbed them of a potential rally to cover the spread.
The human element in umpiring introduces variability in game outcomes, and it’s a variability that skilled bettors try to account for, but with robot umpires? That would be eliminated.
How Robot Umpires Could Change the Game
If MLB does end up changing to automated strike zones, we’d see an immediate and big shift in how games are played. The most obvious? The change is in strike zone consistency.
Why? Because a robo-ump doesn’t “expand” the zone for a pitcher on a hot streak or tighten it because a catcher is bad at framing. It calls the rulebook zone, pitch after pitch, with the same calibration for all. Human umpires call pitches probabilistically on the edges; sometimes a strike, sometimes a ball on identical pitches, whereas an automated system will make the same call every time for a pitch in a given location. Those borderline low-and-away sliders that one ump might call a ball and another a strike will have a uniform verdict.
Less Borderline Discrepancies
What could this mean in practice? For one, fewer borderline discrepancies. There will be no more “make-up calls” or individual ump decisions where a pitch is a strike in the 1st inning but not in the 9th. Over the course of a game (and season), that should decrease the variability in count outcomes.
A borderline 3-2 pitch with bases loaded will be called correctly, one way or the other. This could lead to less argument-induced drama, but more importantly for competition, it means players will adjust to a stable zone. Hitters won’t have to bother holding up their hand asking, “was that high?” because they know that the machine is precise. Pitchers could attack the exact top/bottom of the zone with more confidence, knowing they’ll get the strike if they hit it (and conversely, knowing there’s no hope of an ump giving them an inch off the plate anymore).
Player Performance
From a performance standpoint, we can only speculate on which types of players benefit or suffer. Let’s think about pitchers first. A strikeout pitcher (one with good velocity or nasty stuff that catches the zone) could see a benefit: if they can paint the real edges, they’ll get those calls consistently.
Some power pitchers throw rising fastballs at the top of the zone that occasionally get ruled balls by a human ump who perceives it as too high, but a robot will call those strikes if they nip the zone, potentially increasing high strike calls. And finesse pitchers or “nibblers” who succeed by getting hitters to chase just outside the zone or by relying on a catcher stealing strikes might lose an edge.
With ABS, a pitch that is two inches off the plate will never be called a strike (whereas a good framer and a friendly ump might have gotten that call before). An aspect that players disliked about full ABS was that it removed the art of pitch framing; catchers could no longer influence calls. Those catchers (and their pitchers) could no longer “steal” strikes on borderline pitches by presentation.
ABS Trials
There’s evidence that in the ABS trials, pitching dynamics did shift. In some early uses of full ABS, walks increased by a lot. MLB executives explained that in Triple-A games with full automation, walks became more prevalent, causing games to drag on longer despite the pitch clock.
Why more walks? Likely because pitchers couldn’t get those generous calls on borderline balls, so hitters were more often awarded walks on close pitches that a human might have called a strike. There are also reports that strikeouts actually dipped with the automated zone in certain minor league samples.
A Baseball America analysis of Triple-A data indicated the strikeout rate went down a little, but the walk rate went up, and that’s not exactly the outcome many expected, but it does suggest the zone called by the robot was tighter (or at least different) than what many umps were calling.
In the International League (Triple-A East), runs per game rose from about 4.98 to 5.50 after introducing ABS, walks increased from 4.0 to 4.8 per 9 innings, and hits ticked up as well. This aligns with the idea that a perfectly enforced zone would favor hitters in some ways, certainly in drawing walks, if not in hitting. It’s worth noting MLB adjusted the strike zone dimensions in the ABS system a few times to try to get the “right” balance, so not all ABS zones are identical. A too-big zone would favor pitchers excessively, a too-small zone vice versa. They’re looking for a happy medium that matches the intended rulebook zone without crushing offense or inflating it.
Another expected effect is a decrease in those game-altering “what if” moments that are set off by bad calls. Think about blow-up innings; sometimes a missed strike three leads directly to mayhem.
If an ump misses a strike call that would have been the third out, the at-bat continues, and the batter hits a 3-run double. With ABS, that third out is called correctly, the inning is over, and the rally is prevented. In theory, fewer big innings will be fueled by umpire mistakes, because those mistakes are gone. This could mean more predictable scoring progressions. It’s not to say that big innings won’t happen (they will, via hits and legit walks), but they won’t happen because an umpire gave a free pass or a free strike.
ABS will also prevent situations where a batter was mistakenly called out on strikes on ball four; those innings will now continue when they should have, possibly creating rallies that were unfairly halted before. The net effect is hard to quantify, but overall? The outcomes should lean more toward what the players earn, instead of what an umpire mis-sees.
Could automated zones lead to more offense or less? The early data and player feedback suggest more offense (more walks, slightly higher on-base, maybe slightly longer games) unless the zone is adjusted. MLB saw that as a negative when the pace of play suffered, which is partly why they currently favor the challenge system (let the human call it and only fix the egregious misses).
But regardless of offensive levels, the key is consistency and reduced variance. The day-to-day fluctuation caused by “which ump is behind the plate” would pretty much vanish if every game had the same calibrated zone or the ability to challenge bad calls.
Implications for Run-Line Bettors
From a betting perspective, a world with robot umpires? It’s a world with one less variable (and one less source of randomness) in each game. Below are 5 big-picture implications for run-line bettors!
Decreased Volatility in Scoring Margins
If each game’s strike zone is standardized, we could see more consistent scoring ranges. Umpires won’t be squeezing one pitcher one night and giving a wide zone the next. In theory, this could lead to results that are more in line with the team’s true talent and other factors, rather than occasionally being skewed by an umpire’s influence.
For run-line bets, reduced volatility could mean favorites cover the -1.5 spread at a more predictable rate (depending on their actual superiority), and underdogs get blown out or keep it close based more strictly on skill, not a friendly strike zone. Outcomes might cluster a little more closely around the expected values since an element of randomness is removed. But decreased volatility also means tighter betting lines. Sportsbooks will adjust their odds to the more stable environment, leaving bettors fewer soft spots to exploit. If games become easier to predict, any edge a bettor has will shrink because the bookmakers can predict them better, too!
Better Data Modeling and Handicapping
For the bettors who rely on analytical models to predict games? An automated zone is a dream come true because it’s an elimination of randomness. Currently, a model has to account for umpire tendencies, but with a uniform ABS, today’s handicap (and the sportsbook’s odds) wouldn’t need to worry about who the ump is.
As a result, bettors can put more weight on core factors like the pitchers, lineups, and weather without the wild card of umpire inconsistency. In the early days of ABS introduction, this could be an opportunity: oddsmakers will certainly update totals and run-line pricing based on any league-wide offensive shifts, but they might under- or over-estimate the impact initially. A sharp bettor who studies the minor league data might project that scoring will rise X% due to more walks, and could hammer run-line underdogs if they believe more runs = more chances for the +1.5 side to cover (since higher scoring games sometimes produce closer percentage margins, except in extremes).
But if scoring drops due to a bigger zone, a bettor could focus on favorites covering (-1.5) in lower-scoring, more one-sided games. The point is, early adopters could find an advantage before the market has figured it out. But that edge? It might not last long.
Line Movement and Odds Efficiency
Once the ABS system is established, it will incorporate all known effects (walk rate changes, etc.) into their lines. Any traditional angles like “this ump tends to produce overs, so I’ll bet the over” disappear, because that angle is gone with the ump’s influence.
What remains is more “pure” data. In a way, this levels the playing field between sharp and casual bettors on that front. Those obscure stats about how often Umpire X’s games land one run apart versus two runs apart will be obsolete. The sportsbooks will be cautious early on, and we could see slightly higher totals or slightly inflated odds on certain props until there’s enough data, but by the time robot umps are the norm? The betting market will likely be quite efficient in pricing in the effects. The days of sneaking an Over bet because you know a certain ump calls a tiny zone may be gone for good.
New Angles to Consider
That being said, the game will evolve, and bettors can look for new angles. We could start evaluating pitchers in ABS environments. Some pitchers may have a hard time adjusting, like a starter vet who got by on getting calls just off the black. If he can’t get those anymore, maybe he issues more walks or has to throw more hittable pitches, making him a fade on run-line bets, and you might bet against his team covering, or take the other team’s run line because he could be hit hard or keep games closer than before.
And a flame-throwing strike-thrower could thrive! If he was already pounding the zone, now he gets every borderline strike as well. Bettors could target such pitchers in run-line bets, expecting their team to win by a larger margin because of a pitching edge that’s fully realized with ABS.
Another angle? Patient hitting teams might very well benefit from ABS. If you have a lineup full of players with good strike-zone discipline, they will draw even more walks when the zone is robotically enforced (since borderline calls that might’ve been called strikes now become guaranteed balls if outside). Those extra baserunners would translate to more runs and more covers on the -1.5 run line if that patient team is favored. Or if two patient teams play each other, maybe you lean Over instead of the run-line, expecting a higher-scoring close game with lots of walks.
Impact on 1-run Games
A really interesting question is if robot umps will increase or decrease the frequency of 1-run games (which is directly relevant to run-line bets, because a 1-run margin is the razor’s edge between winning and losing most run-line bets).
If the offense increases (more walks, etc.), one would think that blowouts could become more common (more runs available to create large margins). But a consistent zone might actually prevent some big crooked-number innings, which could keep scores closer. It could also mean a leading team can’t rely on an ump to expand the zone to help them get out of a jam; they’ll have to earn every out, and that gives trailing teams more comeback opportunities.
Yes, it’s kind of a paradox, and we’ll need to see real data once it’s implemented to know. But run-line bettors should be super mindful: if the distribution of victory margins shifts even slightly, it changes how you should price those -1.5 or +1.5 bets. If historically road favorites win by 2+ runs, say, 45% of the time, and after ABS, they win by 2+ runs only 40% of the time, that’s a big deal in setting run-line odds.
Possible Changes in Betting Strategy
Assuming that automated strike zones do become a reality, bettors will have to adjust their strategies! Look below for some changes to think about if it does happen.
Target (or fade) High Strikeout Pitchers
As we said, pitchers who generate lots of swings-and-misses or looking strikes in the zone could become even more effective. Early on, one could bet on teams with power arms to cover the run line.
If Team A’s ace is a big strikeout guy, under ABS, he might rack up Ks and mow through lineups on the reg, making it more likely Team A wins by 2+ runs.
And you could fade finesse pitchers who lived on the edges. These are the types who see pitch counts soar and get into trouble with walks or hitters sitting on predictable strikes. If a known “edge-nibbler” is starting, a bettor could take the +1.5 on the opponent, as they’re expecting a closer game or an upset, because that pitcher can no longer get those cheap strikes and will give up more baserunners.
Monitor Walk Rates and OBP
Bettors should really pay close attention to which teams draw a lot of walks and which pitchers issue walks. Under a robo-zone, patient hitters will probably do even better.
A team that’s patient would be an excellent bet on the run line as an underdog, because they can stay in games by drawing walks and putting pressure on (preventing the favorite from pulling away easily). Or as a favorite, a patient team can blow a game open with walk-filled innings. For prop betting, things like over/under on total walks, or player walk props, could become super attractive in ABS games.
Totals and Alternate Bets
We know that a lot of bettors will initially shy away from run lines until the effects are clear, instead focusing on totals or derivative markets like team totals and props.
If ABS creates a higher baseline of walks, overs on totals might hit more often until lines adjust. If it somehow lowers scoring (due to more strikes called), then unders become the play. Instead of picking a side to win by 2, you could find value in betting a team’s total runs over or under, if you identify they are particularly helped or hurt by the new zone. Maybe there’s a team with free swingers (who currently suffer under human umps because they chase anyway) who won’t be helped by ABS; they’ll strike out or get themselves out regardless. This kind of a team will continue to not score much, so betting their team total under or even taking them -1.5 less often (if they’re the favorite) could be smart!
Consider the Umpiring System in Play
During any transition period, it’s possible that the MLB could implement the challenge system in some games (or some parks) and not others, or the postseason could differ from the regular season at first.
Bettors will need to know the rules for each game! During the Triple-A in 2023, all games switched to the challenge system mid-season, but before that, some days were full ABS and some were human. If MLB did a staggered introduction (say, ABS challenge in certain series or as an experiment), bettors should absolutely factor that in.
A game with full ABS would have a different run environment than a game with a human umpire. Even looking ahead, if MLB uses the challenge system (where only a few calls get changed), the impact is smaller than full ABS. So a bettor’s strategy can differ: under a challenge system, you might still handicap a little based on the scheduled umpire (since 90%+ of calls are still made by humans and only obvious misses get fixed). Under a full ABS, you ignore the umpire’s identity. Staying informed on how the games will be officiated will be a new part of bettors’ daily routines.
Adjust In-game Betting Decisions
In-game (live) betting could also be affected by ABS! The strike zone consistency could make it easier to predict outcomes once you see which pitcher “has it” or not on a given day. If a normally wild pitcher is pounding the zone (and getting strikes), you could bet his team to hold a lead on the run line. And if a team that’s known for patience isn’t drawing walks (maybe the opposing pitcher is exceptionally on with his control that day), you would steer clear of betting that underdog +1.5 live because their usual advantage isn’t materializing.
All of the above strategy shifts boil down to one thing: relearning the nuances of baseball betting in a landscape where one major variable, the umpire, is neutralized. It’s sort of analogous to how bettors had to adjust to the NL adopting the designated hitter or the new extra-inning rules; those changed scoring and strategy, and thus betting dynamics. Robot umps will probably have a similar learning curve.
What the Data Says So Far (Early Trends)
While we don’t have any major-league data for robot umps, the minor league trials give us some clues. We’ve already talked about the main stats: more walks, possibly fewer strikeouts, and a slight increase in runs were observed in some ABS implementations. But we can recap a few early trends from where it’s been used!
Triple-A 2022-2023
In one Triple-A league, after introducing the automated zone, walks went up around 0.8 per game (per team) and strikeouts were roughly flat or dipped slightly, resulting in about a half-run increase in scoring. This suggests that pitchers couldn’t get as many borderline strike calls, putting more men on base via walks. But it didn’t produce a massive offensive explosion, only a moderate bump. Hitters weren’t all of a sudden teeing off for 10 runs a game; they were just reaching base a little more often via the base on balls.
Atlantic League 2019
In the initial indie-league trial, qualitative reports said players were intrigued but had complaints about certain pitches being strikes that never were before (like breaking balls that clip the very bottom of the zone). Statistically, an article from The Ringer noted that the Atlantic League saw strikeout and walk rates rise slightly when ABS was first used, but overall offense (batting average, hitting) stayed almost unchanged. The shape of offense shifted (more Ks and BBs, fewer balls in play), but it didn’t dramatically alter the runs scored.
Player Reactions
Pitchers and hitters have commented on robot umps in minor league play. A common sentiment from pitchers is frustration at the “weird” strike zone.
Red Sox pitcher Nick Pivetta, after a Triple-A rehab start under ABS, said: “I hate it. It’s terrible. Hopefully it never comes [to MLB]. The strike zone is just weird, it just doesn’t match the baseball.”
Hitters have complained as well about high strikes or breaking pitches that clip the zone late, which are things umps often call balls but ABS won’t miss. This says that there will be an adjustment period for players, and it’s a window where some teams will suffer and others benefit until everyone adapts.
Challenge System Data
MLB’s spring 2025 test of the ABS challenge system revealed some interesting stats, too. Teams only challenged about 2.6% of all called pitches (so 97% of calls stood unchallenged), and about 52% of challenges resulted in overturned calls (meaning the ump was wrong on roughly half of the ones players thought were wrong). Catchers were the most successful challengers (winning 56% of their challenges) compared to pitchers (41%), likely because catchers have the best view and sense of the zone. For bettors, if the challenge system is in play, it means that some of the worst calls will be corrected, but some will still occur (you can’t challenge everything, just a few per game). So the impact on run-lines under a challenge system could be smaller, as it trims the extreme misses but doesn’t make every call perfect. Full ABS would be a bigger step-change.
Runs and Margins
It’s way too early to conclude how margins of victory change. But one could look at the distribution of scores in ABS vs non-ABS games in Triple-A for clues. If ABS games had slightly higher variance in scoring due to more walks, or maybe lower variance due to consistent zones, these are the things that data scientists are studying.
One thing we do know? With human umps, about 28-30% of MLB games historically are decided by one run. If robot umps alter that percentage even a little, it changes run-line outcomes.
Could This Actually Help Bettors?
A consistent strike zone takes one unpredictable element off the table. And for those bettors who rely on data and matchup breakdowns? That’s a very good thing. Fewer surprises behind the plate mean outcomes line up more closely with what the numbers suggest.
But that also cuts both ways! If the zone becomes easier to account for, sportsbooks will adjust quickly, and any short-term edge could dry up, so it could be a lot harder to find mispriced lines.
The shift could make things more approachable for newer bettors. Because there are fewer hidden variables in play, projections become cleaner, and the gap between casual and experienced players might shrink, at least for a little while.
The Robot Umps Are Coming: Is Your Run-Line Strategy Ready?
If we’re being honest, the only thing we love more than a bench-clearing field brawl is when a coach loses their sh*t on an umpire before they’re ejected from the game. We’ll miss that!
But robot umpires remove that human error factor that makes players get in their faces, and that’s a good thing (for the umps and the game as a whole).
Once the strike zone stops changing from night to night? Betting on the margins won’t feel quite the same. The usual ump-driven change in baseball game outcomes could be a thing of the past.
Run-line outcomes will always depend on pitching matchups and lineup strength, but plate discipline and pitcher control will matter more. If and when robot umpires happen, watch how teams adjust in those games! Seeing any trends early on will give you an advantage if this system ever does make it to the show.